...
首页> 外文期刊>The Mount Sinai journal of medicine >Epidemiologic research on man-made disasters: strategies and implications of cohort definition for World Trade Center worker and volunteer surveillance program.
【24h】

Epidemiologic research on man-made disasters: strategies and implications of cohort definition for World Trade Center worker and volunteer surveillance program.

机译:人为灾难的流行病学研究:队列定义对世界贸易中心工作人员和志愿者监视计划的策略及影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Studies of long-term health consequences of disasters face unique methodologic challenges. The authors focused on studies of the health of cleanup and recovery workers, who are often poorly enumerated at the outset and difficult to follow over time. Comparison of the experience at the World Trade Center disaster with 4 past incidents of chemical and radiation releases at Seveso, Italy; Bhopal, India; Chernobyl, Ukraine; and Three Mile Island, USA, provided useful contrasts. Each event had methodologic advantages and disadvantages that depended on the nature of the disaster and the availability of records on area residents, and the emergency-response and cleanup protocol. The World Trade Center Worker Monitoring Program has well-defined eligibility criteria but lacks information on the universe of eligible workers to characterize response proportions or the potential for distortion of reported health effects. Nonparticipation may result from lack of interest, lack of awareness of the program, availability of another source of medical care, medical conditions precluding participation, inability to take time off from work, moving out of the area, death, or shift from initially ineligible to eligible status. Some of these considerations suggest selective participation by the sickest individuals, whereas others favor participation by the healthiest. The greatest concern with the validity of inferences regarding elevated health risks relative to external populations is the potential for selective enrollment among those who are affected. If there were a large pool of nonparticipating workers and those who suffered ill health were most motivated to enroll, the rates of disease among participants would be substantially higher than among all those eligible for the program. Future disaster follow-up studies would benefit substantially by having access to accurate estimates of the number of workers and information on the individuals who contributed to the cleanup and recovery effort.
机译:灾难对长期健康后果的研究面临独特的方法论挑战。作者专注于对清理和恢复工作者的健康进行研究,他们一开始常常被列举得很少,并且随着时间的推移很难被追踪。比较世界贸易中心灾难的经验和意大利塞维索过去发生的4次化学和辐射释放事件;印度博帕尔;乌克兰切尔诺贝利;与美国三英里岛(Triple Island)提供了有益的对比。每个事件都有方法上的优缺点,这取决于灾难的性质和区域居民记录的可用性以及应急响应和清理协议。世界贸易中心工人监测计划有明确的资格标准,但缺乏有关合格工人的信息,无法描述反应比例或所报告的健康影响的潜在可能性。不参与可能是由于缺乏兴趣,缺乏对该计划的了解,无法获得其他医疗服务,包括参与在内的医疗状况,无法抽出工作时间,离开该地区,死亡或从最初不符合资格的人转变为合格状态。这些考虑中的一些建议最病的个体选择性参与,而其他一些则建议最健康的个体参与。关于相对于外部人群的健康风险升高的推论的有效性,最令人担忧的是受影响人群中有选择性入学的可能性。如果有大量的不参与计划的工人,而那些健康状况较差的人最有兴趣报名参加,那么参与者中的疾病发病率将大大高于所有有资格参加该计划的人。未来的灾难跟进研究将可通过获得准确的工人数量估计值以及有关为清理和恢复工作做出贡献的个人信息而从中受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号