首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of rheumatology >Does sonographic needle guidance affect the clinical outcome of intraarticular injections?
【24h】

Does sonographic needle guidance affect the clinical outcome of intraarticular injections?

机译:超声针引导是否会影响关节腔内注射的临床效果?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: This randomized controlled study addressed whether sonographic needle guidance affected clinical outcomes of intraarticular (IA) joint injections. METHODS: In total, 148 painful joints were randomized to IA triamcinolone acetonide injection by conventional palpation-guided anatomic injection or sonographic image-guided injection enhanced with a one-handed control syringe (the reciprocating device). A one-needle, 2-syringe technique was used, where the first syringe was used to introduce the needle, aspirate any effusion, and anesthetize and dilate the IA space with lidocaine. After IA placement and synovial space dilation were confirmed, a syringe exchange was performed, and corticosteroid was injected with the second syringe through the indwelling IA needle. Baseline pain, procedural pain, pain at outcome (2 weeks), and changes in pain scores were measured with a 0-10 cm visual analog pain scale (VAS). RESULTS: Relative to conventional palpation-guided methods, sonographic guidance resulted in 43.0% reduction in procedural pain (p < 0.001), 58.5% reduction in absolute pain scores at the 2 week outcome (p < 0.001), 75% reduction in significant pain (VAS pain score > or = 5 cm; p < 0.001), 25.6% increase in the responder rate (reduction in VAS score > or = 50% from baseline; p < 0.01), and 62.0% reduction in the nonresponder rate (reduction in VAS score < 50% from baseline; p < 0.01). Sonography also increased detection of effusion by 200% and volume of aspirated fluid by 337%. CONCLUSION: Sonographic needle guidance significantly improves the performance and outcomes of outpatient IA injections in a clinically significant manner.
机译:目的:这项随机对照研究探讨了超声针引导是否影响关节内(IA)关节注射的临床效果。方法:通过传统的触诊引导解剖注射或超声成像引导注射(单向控制注射器)(往复装置),总共将148个疼痛关节随机分配给IA曲安奈德注射。使用了一个单针2针技术,其中第一个注射器用于插入针头,吸出任何积液,并用利多卡因麻醉和扩张IA空间。确认IA放置和滑膜间隙扩张后,进行注射器更换,并通过留置IA针向皮质类固醇注射第二个注射器。基线疼痛,程序性疼痛,结局性疼痛(2周)和疼痛评分的变化使用0-10厘米视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)进行测量。结果:相对于传统的触诊引导方法,超声引导可以使程序性疼痛减少43.0%(p <0.001),在2周结局时绝对疼痛评分减少58.5%(p <0.001),显着疼痛减少75% (VAS疼痛评分>或= 5 cm; p <0.001),缓解率增加25.6%(VAS评分降低>或=较基线降低50%; p <0.01),无反应者减少62.0%(降低VAS得分<基线的50%; p <0.01)。超声检查还可以增加200%的积液检出率和337%的抽吸液量。结论:超声引导下针刺以临床上显着的方式显着改善了门诊IA注射的性能和结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号