...
首页> 外文期刊>Biological psychiatry >Trait-related decision-making impairment in the three phases of bipolar disorder.
【24h】

Trait-related decision-making impairment in the three phases of bipolar disorder.

机译:双相情感障碍的三个阶段中与特质相关的决策障碍。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: In bipolar disorder (BD), little is known about how deficits in neurocognitive functions such as decision-making are related to phase of illness. We predicted that manic, depressed, and euthymic bipolar patients (BPs) would display impaired decision-making, and we tested whether clinical characteristics could predict patients' decision-making performance. METHODS: Subjects (N = 317; age range: 18-65 years) including 167 BPs (45 manic and 32 depressed inpatients, and 90 euthymic outpatients) and 150 age-, IQ-, and gender-matched healthy control (HC) participants, were included within three university psychiatric hospitals using a cross-sectional design. The relationship between predictor variables and decision-making was assessed by one-step multivariate analysis. The main outcome measures were overall decision-making ability on the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and an index of sensitivity to punishment frequency. RESULTS: Manic, depressed, and euthymic BPs selected significantly more cards from the risky decks than HCs (p < .001, p < .01, and p < .05, respectively), with no significant differences between the three BD groups. However, like HCs, BPs preferred decks that yielded infrequent penalties over those yielding frequent penalties. In multivariate analysis, decision-making impairment was significantly (p < .001) predicted by low level of education, high depressive scores, family history of BD, use of benzodiazepines, and nonuse of serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) antidepressants. CONCLUSIONS: BPs have a trait-related impairment in decision-making that does not vary across illness phase. However, some subtle differences between the BD groups in the individual deck analyses may point to subtle state influences on reinforcement mechanisms, in addition to a more fundamental trait impairment in risk-sensitive decision making.
机译:背景:在躁郁症(BD)中,人们对诸如决策等神经认知功能缺陷与疾病阶段之间的关系知之甚少。我们预测躁狂,抑郁和正常人双相情感障碍患者(BP)的决策能力会受损,并且我们测试了临床特征是否可以预测患者的决策能力。方法:受试者(N = 317;年龄范围:18-65岁),包括167个BP(45个躁狂和32个抑郁症住院患者,以及90个正常的门诊患者)和150个年龄,智商和性别匹配的健康对照(HC)参与者使用横断面设计被纳入三所大学精神病医院。预测变量与决策之间的关系通过一步多变量分析进行评估。主要结果指标是爱荷华州赌博任务(IGT)的总体决策能力以及对惩罚频率的敏感度指标。结果:躁狂,抑郁和正常的BP从风险套牌中选择的牌明显多于HC(分别为p <.001,p <.01和p <.05),三个BD组之间没有显着差异。但是,与HC一样,BP较不频繁处罚的甲板更喜欢不经常处罚的甲板。在多变量分析中,低教育程度,高抑郁评分,BD家族史,使用苯二氮卓类药物以及不使用5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRI)抗抑郁药可显着预测决策障碍(p <.001)。结论:血压在决策中具有与特质相关的损伤,并且在疾病阶段之间没有变化。但是,在各个套票分析中,BD组之间的一些细微差异可能表明,除了对风险敏感的决策中更根本的特质损害外,状态对强化机制的影响也微乎其微。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号