首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet infectious diseases >Antibacterial honey for the prevention of peritoneal-dialysis-related infections (HONEYPOT): A randomised trial
【24h】

Antibacterial honey for the prevention of peritoneal-dialysis-related infections (HONEYPOT): A randomised trial

机译:预防腹膜透析相关感染的抗菌蜂蜜(HONEYPOT):一项随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: There is a paucity of evidence to guide the best strategy for prevention of peritoneal-dialysis-related infections. Antibacterial honey has shown promise as a novel, cheap, effective, topical prophylactic agent without inducing microbial resistance. We therefore assessed whether daily application of honey at the exit site would increase the time to peritoneal-dialysis-related infections compared with standard exit-site care plus intranasal mupirocin prophylaxis for nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus. Methods: In this open-label trial undertaken in 26 centres in Australia and New Zealand, participants undergoing peritoneal dialysis were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio with an adaptive allocation algorithm to daily topical exit-site application of antibacterial honey plus standard exit-site care or intranasal mupirocin prophylaxis (only in carriers of nasal S aureus) plus standard exit-site care (control group). The primary endpoint was time to first infection related to peritoneal dialysis (exit-site infection, tunnel infection, or peritonitis). The trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number 12607000537459. Findings: Of 371 participants, 186 were assigned to the honey group and 185 to the control group. The median peritoneal-dialysis-related infection-free survival times were not significantly different in the honey (16·0 months [IQR not estimable]) and control groups (17·7 months [not estimable]; unadjusted hazard ratio 1·12, 95% CI 0·83-1·51; p=0·47). In the subgroup analyses, honey increased the risks of both the primary endpoint (1·85, 1·05-3·24; p=0·03) and peritonitis (2·25, 1·16-4·36) in participants with diabetes. The incidences of serious adverse events (298 vs 327, respectively; p=0·1) and deaths (14 vs 18, respectively; p=0·9) were not significantly different in the honey and control groups. 11 (6%) participants in the honey group had local skin reactions. Interpretation: The findings of this trial show that honey cannot be recommended routinely for the prevention of peritoneal-dialysis-related infections. Funding: Baxter Healthcare, Queensland Government, Comvita, and Gambro.
机译:背景:缺乏证据来指导预防腹膜透析相关感染的最佳策略。抗菌蜂蜜已显示出作为新颖,便宜,有效的局部预防剂的前景,而不会引起微生物抗药性。因此,我们评估了与标准出口现场护理加鼻内莫匹罗星预防金黄色葡萄球菌鼻载体相比,在出口现场每日应用蜂蜜是否会增加腹膜透析相关感染的时间。方法:在澳大利亚和新西兰的26个中心进行的这项开放标签试验中,接受腹膜透析的参与者采用自适应分配算法以1:1的比例随机分配到抗菌药物加标准出口蜂蜜的每日局部出口现场应用中。现场护理或鼻内莫匹罗星预防(仅在鼻金黄色葡萄球菌携带者中)加上标准的出口现场护理(对照组)。主要终点是首次与腹膜透析相关的感染(出口部位感染,隧道感染或腹膜炎)。该试验已在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册处注册,编号为12607000537459。结果:在371名参与者中,有186人被分配到了蜂蜜组中,有185人被分配到了对照组中。蜂蜜(16·0个月[IQR不可估算])和对照组(17·7个月[不可估算];腹膜透析相关的无感染存活时间中位数无显着差异;未调整的危险比1·12, 95%CI 0·83-1·51; p = 0·47)。在亚组分析中,蜂蜜增加了参与者的主要终点指标(1·85、1·05-3·24; p = 0·03)和腹膜炎(2·25、1·16-4·36)的风险与糖尿病。在蜂蜜和对照组中,严重不良事件的发生率(分别为298和327; p = 0·1)和死亡(分别为14和18; p = 0·9)没有显着差异。蜂蜜组中有11名(6%)参与者有局部皮肤反应。解释:该试验的结果表明,不能常规推荐使用蜂蜜预防腹膜透析相关感染。资金来源:百特医疗,昆士兰州政府,Comvita和Gambro。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号