首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Comparison of effects of oral deferiprone and subcutaneous desferrioxamine on myocardial iron concentrations and ventricular function in beta-thalassaemia.
【24h】

Comparison of effects of oral deferiprone and subcutaneous desferrioxamine on myocardial iron concentrations and ventricular function in beta-thalassaemia.

机译:口服去铁酮和皮下去铁胺对β地中海贫血中心肌铁浓度和心室功能的影响比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Despite the introduction of the parenteral iron chelator desferrioxamine more than 30 years ago, 50% of patients with thalassaemia major die before the age of 35 years, predominantly from iron-induced heart failure. The only alternative treatment is oral deferiprone, but its long-term efficacy on myocardial iron concentrations is unknown. METHODS: We compared myocardial iron content and cardiac function in 15 patients receiving long-term deferiprone treatment with 30 matched thalassaemia major controls who were on long-term treatment with desferrioxamine. Myocardial iron concentrations were measured by a new magnetic-resonance T2* technique, which shows values inversely related to tissue iron concentration. FINDINGS: The deferiprone group had significantly less myocardial iron (median 34.0 ms vs 11.4 ms, p=0.02) and higher ejection fractions (mean 70% [SD 6.5] vs 63% [6.9], p=0.004) than the desferrioxamine controls. Excess myocardial iron (T2* <20 ms) was less common in the deferiprone group than in the desferrioxamine controls (four [27%] vs 20 [67%], p=0.025), as was severe (T2* <10 ms) iron overload (one [7%] vs 11 [37%], p=0.04). The odds ratio for excess myocardial iron in the desferrioxamine controls versus the deferiprone group was 5.5 (95% CI 1.2-28.8). INTERPRETATION: Conventional chelation treatment with subcutaneous desferrioxamine does not prevent excess cardiac iron deposition in two-thirds of patients with thalassaemia major, placing them at risk of heart failure and its complications. Oral deferiprone is more effective than desferrioxamine in removal of myocardial iron.
机译:背景:尽管30多年前引入了肠胃外铁螯合剂去铁胺,但仍有50%的重型地中海贫血患者在35岁之前死亡,主要死于铁引起的心力衰竭。唯一的替代治疗方法是口服去铁酮,但其对心肌铁浓度的长期疗效尚不清楚。方法:我们比较了接受长期去铁酮治疗的15例患者和接受去铁氧胺长期治疗的30位相匹配的地中海贫血主要对照者的心肌铁含量和心功能。心肌铁浓度是通过一种新的磁共振T2 *技术测量的,该技术显示的值与组织铁浓度成反比。结果:与去铁敏胺对照组相比,去铁酮组的心肌铁明显减少(中位34.0 ms vs 11.4 ms,p = 0.02)和更高的射血分数(平均70%[SD 6.5] vs 63%[6.9],p = 0.004)。在去铁酮组中,心肌铁过量(T2 * <20 ms)比去铁敏胺对照组少(4 [27%]对20 [67%],p = 0.025),严重的是(T2 * <10 ms)铁过载(1 [7%]比11 [37%],p = 0.04)。去铁胺对照组和去铁酮组心肌铁过量的比值比为5.5(95%CI 1.2-28.8)。解释:传统的皮下去铁敏治疗螯合剂并不能防止三分之二的重型地中海贫血患者心脏铁沉积过多,从而使他们处于心力衰竭及其并发症的风险中。口服去铁酮在去除心肌铁方面比去铁胺更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号