...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Clinical importance of neutralising antibodies against interferon beta in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
【24h】

Clinical importance of neutralising antibodies against interferon beta in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

机译:复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者中和干扰素β抗体的临床重要性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Interferon beta is the first-line treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, but the drug can induce neutralising antibodies against itself, which might reduce effectiveness. We aimed to assess the clinical effect of neutralising antibodies. METHODS: We measured neutralising antibodies every 12 months for up to 60 months in 541 patients with multiple sclerosis, randomly selected from all patients who started treatment with interferon beta between 1996 and 1999. Patients left the study if they changed or discontinued therapy. Antibodies were measured blindly, using antiviral neutralisation bioassays with high, medium, and low sensitivity, and with different neutralising capacities as cutoff value for definition of a neutralising-antibody-positive result. FINDINGS: Patients developed neutralising antibodies independent of age, sex, disease duration, and progression index at start of treatment. Relapse rates were significantly higher during antibody-positive periods (0.64-0.70) thanthey were during antibody-negative periods (0.43-0.46; p<0.03). When comparing the number of relapses in the neutralising-antibody-positive and neutralising-antibody-negative periods we found odds ratios in the range 1.51 to 1.58 (p<0.03). Time to first relapse was significantly increased by 244 days in patients who were antibody-negative at 12 months (log rank test 6.83, p=0.009). During this short-term study, presence of neutralising antibodies did not affect disease progression measured with the expanded disability status scale. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that the presence of neutralising antibodies against interferon beta reduces the clinical effect of the drug. In patients who are not doing well on interferon beta, the presence of such antibodies should prompt consideration about change of treatment.
机译:背景:干扰素β是复发缓解型多发性硬化症的一线治疗方法,但该药物可诱导针对自身的中和抗体,这可能会降低疗效。我们旨在评估中和抗体的临床效果。方法:我们在541名多发性硬化症患者中每12个月(最多60个月)测量了中和抗体,这些患者是从1996年至1999年开始使用干扰素β治疗的所有患者中随机选择的。如果患者改变或终止治疗,则退出研究。使用具有高,中和低敏感性,并且具有不同中和能力作为确定中和抗体阳性结果的临界值的抗病毒中和生物测定法盲目测量抗体。结果:患者在治疗开始时就产生了中和抗体,与年龄,性别,疾病持续时间和进展指数无关。抗体阳性期间(0.64-0.70)的复发率显着高于抗体阴性期间(0.43-0.46; p <0.03)。当比较中和抗体阳性和中和抗体阴性期间的复发次数时,我们发现比值比在1.51至1.58之间(p <0.03)。在12个月抗体阴性的患者中,首次复发的时间显着增加了244天(对数秩检验为6.83,p = 0.009)。在这项短期研究中,中和抗体的存在不会影响以扩大的残疾状态量表衡量的疾病进展。解释:我们的发现表明,针对干扰素β的中和抗体的存在降低了该药物的临床效果。对于干扰素β治疗效果不佳的患者,此类抗体的存在应立即考虑改变治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号