首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Risk of acute myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death in patients treated with cyclo-oxygenase 2 selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: nested case-control study.
【24h】

Risk of acute myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death in patients treated with cyclo-oxygenase 2 selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: nested case-control study.

机译:使用环加氧酶2选择性和非选择性非甾体抗炎药治疗的患者发生急性心肌梗塞和心源性猝死的风险:嵌套病例对照研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Controversy has surrounded the question about whether high-dose rofecoxib increases or naproxen decreases the risk of serious coronary heart disease. We sought to establish if risk was enhanced with rofecoxib at either high or standard doses compared with remote non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use or celecoxib use, because celecoxib was the most common alternative to rofecoxib. METHODS: We used data from Kaiser Permanente in California to assemble a cohort of all patients age 18-84 years treated with a NSAID between Jan 1, 1999, and Dec 31, 2001, within which we did a nested case-control study. Cases of serious coronary heart disease (acute myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death) were risk-set matched with four controls for age, sex, and health plan region. Current exposure to cyclo-oxygenase 2 selective and non-selective NSAIDs was compared with remote exposure to any NSAID, and rofecoxib was compared with celecoxib. FINDINGS: During 2302029 person-years of follow-up, 8143 cases of serious coronary heart disease occurred, of which 2210 (27.1%) were fatal. Multivariate adjusted odds ratios versus celecoxib were: for rofecoxib (all doses), 1.59 (95% CI 1.10-2.32, p=0.015); for rofecoxib 25 mg/day or less, 1.47 (0.99-2.17, p=0.054); and for rofecoxib greater than 25 mg/day, 3.58 (1.27-10.11, p=0.016). For naproxen versus remote NSAID use the adjusted odds ratio was 1.14 (1.00-1.30, p=0.05). INTERPRETATION: Rofecoxib use increases the risk of serious coronary heart disease compared with celecoxib use. Naproxen use does not protect against serious coronary heart disease.
机译:背景:关于高剂量罗非昔布增加或萘普生降低严重冠心病风险的问题一直存在争议。我们试图确定与远程非甾体类抗炎药(NSAID)或塞来昔布相比,高剂量或标准剂量的罗非昔布是否会增加风险,因为塞来昔布是罗非考昔最常见的替代品。方法:我们使用来自加利福尼亚州Kaiser Permanente的数据,收集了1999年1月1日至2001年12月31日期间接受NSAID治疗的所有18-84岁患者的队列研究,在其中进行了嵌套病例对照研究。将严重冠心病(急性心肌梗塞和心源性猝死)病例与年龄,性别和健康计划区域的四个对照进行风险设定。将当前暴露于环氧化酶2选择性和非选择性NSAID的暴露与远程暴露于任何NSAID的暴露进行比较,并将罗非考昔与塞来昔布进行比较。结果:在2302029人年的随访期间,发生了8143例严重的冠心病病例,其中2210例(27.1%)是致命的。相对于塞来昔布的多元调整优势比为:罗非昔布(所有剂量)为1.59(95%CI 1.10-2.32,p = 0.015);罗非昔布25毫克/天或更少,1.47(0.99-2.17,p = 0.054);罗非昔布大于25毫克/天时为3.58(1.27-10.11,p = 0.016)。对于萘普生与远端NSAID,调整后的优势比为1.14(1.00-1.30,p = 0.05)。解释:与塞来昔布相比,使用罗非昔布增加了发生严重冠心病的风险。萘普生的使用不能预防严重的冠心病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号