首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Single-dose brachytherapy versus metal stent placement for the palliation of dysphagia from oesophageal cancer: multicentre randomised trial.
【24h】

Single-dose brachytherapy versus metal stent placement for the palliation of dysphagia from oesophageal cancer: multicentre randomised trial.

机译:单剂量近距离放射治疗与金属支架置入术治疗食管癌吞咽困难的缓解:多中心随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Both single-dose brachytherapy and self-expanding metal stent placement are commonly used for palliation of oesophageal obstruction due to inoperable cancer, but their relative merits are unknown. We undertook a randomised trial to compare the outcomes of brachytherapy and stent placement in patients with oesophageal cancer. METHODS: Nine hospitals in the Netherlands participated in our study. Between December, 1999, and June, 2002, 209 patients with dysphagia from inoperable carcinoma of the oesophagus or oesophagogastric junction were randomly assigned to stent placement (n=108) or single-dose (12 Gy) brachytherapy (n=101), and were followed up after treatment. Primary outcome was relief of dysphagia during follow-up, and secondary outcomes were complications, treatment for persistent or recurrent dysphagia, health-related quality of life, and costs. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Nine patients (six [brachytherapy] vs three [stent placement]) did not receive their allocated treatments. None was lost to follow-up. Dysphagia improved more rapidly after stent placement than after brachytherapy, but long-term relief of dysphagia was better after brachytherapy. Stent placement had more complications than brachytherapy (36 [33%] of 108 vs 21 [21%] of 101; p=0.02), which was mainly due to an increased incidence of late haemorrhage (14 [13%] of 108 vs five [5%] of 101; p=0.05). Groups did not differ for persistent or recurrent dysphagia (p=0.81), or for median survival (p=0.23). Quality-of-life scores were in favour of brachytherapy compared with stent placement. Total medical costs were also much the same for stent placement (8215) and brachytherapy (8135). INTERPRETATION: Despite slow improvement, single-dose brachytherapy gave better long-term relief of dysphagia than metal stent placement. Since brachytherapy was also associated with fewer complications than stent placement, we recommend it as the primary treatment for palliation of dysphagia from oesophageal cancer.
机译:背景:单剂量近距离放射治疗和自扩张金属支架置入通常用于缓解因无法手术治疗的癌症而引起的食管阻塞,但其相对优点尚不清楚。我们进行了一项随机试验,比较食管癌患者近距离放射治疗和支架置入的结果。方法:荷兰的9家医院参加了我们的研究。在1999年12月至2002年6月期间,将209例因食道或食管胃交界处无法手术的癌症而引起的吞咽困难的患者随机分配至支架置入(n = 108)或单剂量(12 Gy)近距离放疗(n = 101),以及治疗后进行随访。主要结局是随访期间吞咽困难的缓解,次要结局是并发症,持续性或反复性吞咽困难的治疗,与健康相关的生活质量和费用。分析是按意向进行的。结果:9例患者(6例[近距离放射治疗] vs 3例[支架置入])未接受分配的治疗。没有人失去后续行动。放置支架后吞咽困难比近距离放射治疗更快,但是远距离放射治疗后吞咽困难的长期缓解效果更好。支架置入术比近距离放疗术具有更多的并发症(108的36 [33%]比101的21 [21%]; p = 0.02),主要是由于晚期出血的发生率增加(108的14 [13%]比5的多) 101的[5%]; p = 0.05)。对于持续性或复发性吞咽困难(p = 0.81)或中位生存期(p = 0.23),各组无差异。与支架置入相比,生活质量评分有利于近距离放射治疗。支架放置(8215)和近距离放射治疗(8135)的总医疗费用也大致相同。解释:尽管进展缓慢,但是单剂量近距离放射治疗比吞咽支架置入术能更好地长期缓解吞咽困难。由于近距离放疗还比支架置入术并发症少,因此我们建议将其作为减轻食管癌吞咽困难的主要治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号