首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
【24h】

Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

机译:高危患者(MATCH)最近发生缺血性中风或短暂性脑缺血发作后,阿司匹林和氯吡格雷与单独使用氯吡格雷的比较:随机,双盲,安慰剂对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel was superior to aspirin in patients with previous manifestations of atherothrombotic disease in the CAPRIE study and its benefit was amplified in some high-risk subgroups of patients. We aimed to assess whether addition of aspirin to clopidogrel could have a greater benefit than clopidogrel alone in prevention of vascular events with potentially higher bleeding risk. METHODS: We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to compare aspirin (75 mg/day) with placebo in 7599 high-risk patients with recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack and at least one additional vascular risk factor who were already receiving clopidogrel 75 mg/day. Duration of treatment and follow-up was 18 months. The primary endpoint was a composite of ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction, vascular death, or rehospitalisation for acute ischaemia (including rehospitalisation for transient ischaemic attack, angina pectoris, or worsening of peripheral arterial disease). Analysis was by intention to treat, using logrank test and a Cox's proportional-hazards model. FINDINGS: 596 (15.7%) patients reached the primary endpoint in the group receiving aspirin and clopidogrel compared with 636 (16.7%) in the clopidogrel alone group (relative risk reduction 6.4%, [95% CI -4.6 to 16.3]; absolute risk reduction 1% [-0.6 to 2.7]). Life-threatening bleedings were higher in the group receiving aspirin and clopidogrel versus clopidogrel alone (96 [2.6%] vs 49 [1.3%]; absolute risk increase 1.3% [95% CI 0.6 to 1.9]). Major bleedings were also increased in the group receiving aspirin and clopidogrel but no difference was recorded in mortality. INTERPRETATION: Adding aspirin to clopidogrel in high-risk patients with recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack is associated with a non-significant difference in reducing major vascular events. However, the risk of life-threatening or major bleeding is increased by the addition of aspirin.
机译:背景:在CAPRIE研究中,氯吡格雷在先前有动脉粥样硬化性疾病表现的患者中优于阿司匹林,并且在某些高危患者亚组中其获益有所增加。我们的目的是评估在预防可能发生更高出血风险的血管事件中,向氯吡格雷中添加阿司匹林是否比单独使用氯吡格雷具有更大的益处。方法:我们进行了一项随机,双盲,安慰剂对照试验,比较了7599名近期有缺血性中风或短暂性脑缺血发作且至少有一个额外血管危险因素的高风险患者中阿司匹林(75毫克/天)与安慰剂的比较已经接受氯吡格雷75毫克/天。治疗和随访时间为18个月。主要终点指标是缺血性中风,心肌梗塞,血管死亡或因急性缺血而进行住院治疗(包括因短暂性脑缺血发作,心绞痛或外周动脉疾病恶化而进行的住院治疗)的综合指标。使用对数秩检验和Cox比例风险模型按意图进行分析。结果:接受阿司匹林和氯吡格雷治疗组中有596名患者(15.7%)达到主要终点,而单独使用氯吡格雷组则为636名(16.7%)(相对危险度降低6.4%,[95%CI -4.6至16.3];绝对危险度)减少1%[-0.6至2.7])。与单独使用氯吡格雷相比,接受阿司匹林和氯吡格雷组的威胁生命的出血更高(96 [2.6%]比49 [1.3%];绝对危险度增加1.3%[95%CI 0.6至1.9])。在接受阿司匹林和氯吡格雷治疗的组中,大出血量也有所增加,但是死亡率没有差异。解释:在近期缺血性中风或短暂性脑缺血发作的高危患者中,向氯吡格雷中添加阿司匹林与减少主要血管事件方面无显着差异有关。但是,添加阿司匹林会增加危及生命或大出血的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号