...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Joint teleconsultations (virtual outreach) versus standard outpatient appointments for patients referred by their general practitioner for a specialist opinion: a randomised trial.
【24h】

Joint teleconsultations (virtual outreach) versus standard outpatient appointments for patients referred by their general practitioner for a specialist opinion: a randomised trial.

机译:由全科医生转诊以获得专家意见的患者进行联合远程会诊(虚拟外展)与标准门诊约会:一项随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The current model of general practitioner referral of patients to hospital specialists in the UK is sometimes associated with unnecessary duplication of investigations and treatments. We aimed to compare joint teleconsultations between general practitioners, specialists, and patients (virtual outreach) with standard outpatient referral. METHODS: Virtual outreach services were established in London and Shrewsbury. The general practitioners referred 3170 patients, of whom 2094 consented to participate in the study and were eligible for inclusion. 1051 patients were randomly assigned virtual outreach, and 1043 standard outpatient appointments. We followed up the patients for 6 months after their index consultation. The primary outcome measure was the offer of a follow-up outpatient appointment. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: More patients in the virtual outreach group than the standard group were offered a follow-up appointment (502 [52%] vs 400 [41%], odds ratio 1.52 [95% CI 1.27-1.82], p<0.0001). Significant differences in effects were observed between the two sites (p=0.009) and across different specialties (p<0.0001). Virtual outreach increased the offers of follow-up appointments more in Shrewsbury than in London, and more in ear, nose, and throat surgery and orthopaedics than in the other specialties. Fewer tests and investigations were ordered in the virtual outreach group by an average of 0.79 per patient (0.37-1.21, p=0.0002). Patients' satisfaction (analysed per protocol) was greater after a virtual outreach consultation than after a standard outpatient consultation (mean difference 0.33 scale points [95% CI 0.23-0.43], p<0.0001), with no heterogeneity between specialties or sites. INTERPRETATION: The trial showed that allocation of patients to virtual outreach consultations is variably associated with increased offers of follow-up appointments according to site and specialty, but leads to significant increases in patients' satisfaction and substantial reductions in tests and investigations. Efficient operation of such services will require appropriate selection of patients, significant service reorganisation, and provision of logistical support.
机译:背景:在英国,将患者转诊给医院专科医生的当前模式有时与不必要的调查和治疗重复有关。我们旨在比较普通医师,专科医生和患者(虚拟外展)与标准门诊转诊之间的联合远程会诊。方法:在伦敦和什鲁斯伯里建立了虚拟外展服务。全科医生转诊了3170例患者,其中2094例同意参与研究并符合纳入条件。 1051名患者被随机分配了虚拟外展服务和1043例标准门诊患者。在对患者进行指数咨询后,我们对其随访了6个月。主要的结局指标是门诊随访。分析是按意向进行的。结果:接受虚拟随访的患者比标准组更多(502 [52%] vs 400 [41%],优势比1.52 [95%CI 1.27-1.82],p <0.0001)。在两个部位之间(p = 0.009)和不同专业之间(p <0.0001)观察到效果的显着差异。虚拟外展活动增加了在什鲁斯伯里的随访服务,而不是伦敦,而且在耳,鼻,喉外科和骨科方面也比其他专业更多。在虚拟外展组中,订购的测试和调查较少,平均每位患者0.79(0.37-1.21,p = 0.0002)。在虚拟外展咨询后,患者的满意度(按方案分析)要比在标准门诊咨询后更高(平均差异0.33量表分[95%CI 0.23-0.43],p <0.0001),并且专业或站点之间没有异质性。解释:该试验表明,根据现场和专业情况,将患者分配到虚拟外展咨询会增加跟进预约的次数,但会导致患者满意度的显着提高以及测试和调查的大幅减少。此类服务的有效运营将需要对患者进行适当的选择,对服务进行重大重组,并提供后勤支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号