...
首页> 外文期刊>The Lancet >Randomised trial of effects of calcium antagonists compared with diuretics and beta-blockers on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Nordic Diltiazem (NORDIL) study (see comments)
【24h】

Randomised trial of effects of calcium antagonists compared with diuretics and beta-blockers on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension: the Nordic Diltiazem (NORDIL) study (see comments)

机译:钙拮抗剂与利尿剂和β受体阻滞剂比较对高血压心血管疾病发病率和死亡率的随机试验:北欧地尔硫卓(NORDIL)研究(参见评论)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Calcium antagonists are a first-line treatment for hypertension. The effectiveness of diltiazem, a non-dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, in reducing cardiovascular morbidity or mortality is unclear. We compared the effects of diltiazem with that of diuretics, beta-blockers, or both on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients. METHODS: In a prospective, randomised, open, blinded endpoint study, we enrolled 10,881 patients, aged 50-74 years, at health centres in Norway and Sweden, who had diastolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or more. We randomly assigned patients diltiazem, or diuretics, beta-blockers, or both. The combined primary endpoint was fatal and non-fatal stroke, myocardial infarction, and other cardiovascular death. Analysis was done by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were lowered effectively in the diltiazem and diuretic and beta-blocker groups (reduction 20.3/18.7 vs 23.3/18.7 mm Hg; difference in systolic reduction p<0.001). A primary endpoint occurred in 403 patients in the diltiazem group and in 400 in the diuretic and beta-blocker group (16.6 vs 16.2 events per 1000 patient-years; relative risk 1.00 [95% CI 0.87-1.15], p=0.97). Fatal and non-fatal stroke occurred in 159 patients in the diltiazem group and in 196 in the diuretic and beta-blocker group (6.4 vs 7.9 events per 1000 patient-years; 0.80 [0.65-0.99], p=0.04) and fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction in 183 and 157 patients (7.4 vs 6.3 events per 1000 patient-years; 1.16 [0.94-1.44], p=0.17). INTERPRETATION: Diltiazem was as effective as treatment based on diuretics, beta-blockers, or both in preventing the combined primary endpoint of all stroke, myocardial infarction, and other cardiovascular death.
机译:背景:钙拮抗剂是高血压的一线治疗方法。非地尔硫卓(一种非二氢吡啶类钙拮抗剂)在降低心血管疾病发病率或死亡率方面的作用尚不清楚。我们比较了地尔硫卓与利尿剂,β受体阻滞剂或两者对高血压患者心血管发病率和死亡率的影响。方法:在一项前瞻性,随机,开放,盲目的终点研究中,我们在挪威和瑞典的健康中心招募了10,881名年龄在50-74岁之间的患者,他们的舒张压为100 mm Hg或更高。我们为患者随机分配了地尔硫卓或利尿剂,β-受体阻滞剂或两者。主要终点为致命和非致命性中风,心肌梗塞和其他心血管死亡。分析是按意向进行的。结果:地尔硫卓,利尿剂和β受体阻滞剂组的收缩压和舒张压均有效降低(降低20.3 / 18.7 vs 23.3 / 18.7 mm Hg;收缩压降低的差异p <0.001)。主要终点发生在地尔硫卓组的403位患者和利尿药和β受体阻滞剂组的400位患者中(每1000患者-年发生16.6 vs 16.2事件;相对危险度1.00 [95%CI 0.87-1.15],p = 0.97)。地尔硫卓组159例患者发生致命性和非致命性中风,利尿剂和β受体阻滞剂组中196例发生(每1000患者年6.4 vs 7.9事件; 0.80 [0.65-0.99],p = 0.04),致命和非致命性卒中非致命性心肌梗塞发生在183和157位患者中(每1000患者年7.4和6.3事件; 1.16 [0.94-1.44],p = 0.17)。解释:地尔硫卓在预防所有中风,心肌梗塞和其他心血管死亡的综合主要终点方面,与基于利尿剂,β受体阻滞剂或两者的治疗一样有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号