首页> 外文期刊>The neurologist. >Clinical characteristics of symptomatic vertebral artery dissection a systematic review
【24h】

Clinical characteristics of symptomatic vertebral artery dissection a systematic review

机译:对症椎动脉夹层的临床特点系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Vertebral artery dissection (VAD) is an important cause of stroke in the young. It can present nonspecifically and may be misdiagnosed with adverse consequences. We assessed the frequency of headeck pain, other neurological symptoms, and cerebrovascular events in symptomatic VAD. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of observational studies, searching electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE) for Englishlanguage manuscripts with >5 subjects with clinical or radiologic features of VAD. Two independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion; a third adjudicated differences. Studies were assessed for methodological quality, and clinical data were abstracted. Pooled proportions were calculated. Results: Of 3996 citations, we screened 511 manuscripts and selected 75 studies describing 1972 VAD patients. The most common symptoms were dizziness/vertigo (58%), headache (51%), and neck pain (46%). Stroke was common (63%), especially with extracranial dissections (66% vs. 32%, P < 0.0001), whereas transient ischemic attack (14%) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (10%) were uncommon. Subarachnoid hemorrhage was seen only with intracranial dissections (57% vs. 0%, P = 0.003). Fewer than half of the patients had obvious trauma, and only 7.9% had a known connective tissue disease. Outcome was good (modified Rankin scale 0 to 1) in 67% and poor (modified Rankin scale 5 to 6) in 10% of patients. Conclusions: VAD is associated with nonspecific symptoms such as dizziness, vertigo, headache, or neck pain. Ischemic stroke is the most common reported cerebrovascular complication. VAD should be considered in the diagnostic assessment of patients presenting with dizziness or craniocervical pain, even in the absence of other risk factors. Future studies should compare clinical findings as predictors in well-defined, undifferentiated populations of clinical VAD suspects.
机译:背景:椎动脉解剖(VAD)是年轻人中风的重要原因。它可能表现为非特异性,并可能被误诊为不良后果。我们评估了有症状VAD中头/颈部疼痛,其他神经系统症状和脑血管事件的发生频率。方法:我们对观察性研究进行了系统的综述,在电子数据库(MEDLINE,EMBASE)中搜索了具有> 5个具有VAD临床或放射学特征的受试者的英语手稿。两名独立评论者选择了纳入研究;第三,裁定分歧。评估研究的方法学质量,并提取临床数据。计算合并比例。结果:在3996篇文献中,我们筛选了511篇论文,并选择了75篇描述1972年VAD患者的研究。最常见的症状是头晕/眩晕(58%),头痛(51%)和颈部疼痛(46%)。中风是常见的(63%),尤其是颅外夹层(66%比32%,P <0.0001),而短暂性脑缺血发作(14%)和蛛网膜下腔出血(10%)并不常见。蛛网膜下腔出血仅在颅内清扫术中可见(57%vs. 0%,P = 0.003)。不到一半的患者有明显的创伤,只有7.9%的患者患有已知的结缔组织病。 67%的患者的结果为好(Rankin量表为0至1),10%的患者为差(Rankin量表为5至6)。结论:VAD与非特异性症状有关,例如头晕,眩晕,头痛或颈部疼痛。缺血性中风是最常见的脑血管并发症。即使没有其他危险因素,也应在出现头晕或颅颈痛的患者的诊断评估中考虑使用VAD。未来的研究应将临床发现与未明确区分的临床VAD嫌疑人群中的预测指标进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号