首页> 外文期刊>The neurologist. >Neuroscience curriculum changes and outcomes: Medical university of South Carolina, 2006 to 2010
【24h】

Neuroscience curriculum changes and outcomes: Medical university of South Carolina, 2006 to 2010

机译:神经科学课程的变化和结果:南卡罗来纳州医科大学,2006年至2010年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: To develop future neurologists and translational neuroscientists, we created a neurosciences pathway throughout our medical school curriculum that included early exposure to clinical neurosciences decision-making and added variety to the choices of later clinical neurosciences experiences. METHODS:: Our curricular innovation had 3 parts: (1) integrating basic neurosciences content into an explicit clinical context in a College of Medicine (COM) first year of medical school; (2) expanding pathophysiological principles related to neurosciences in COM second year of medical school; and (3) creating a variety of 3-week clinical neurosciences selectives in COM third year of medical school and 4-week electives/externships for interested learners in COM fourth year of medical school. These new changes were evaluated (1) by comparing national standardized examinations including Neurology Subject examination scores for students choosing clinical neurosciences selectives; (2) by student satisfaction Graduate Questionnaires; and (3) by the total number of our graduates matching in US neurosciences disciplines. Results: Students taking neuroscience selectives demonstrated a nonsignificant trend toward higher Step 2 Clinical Knowledge scores. The students' Neurology Subject examination scores were comparable with those scores reported nationally for other US COM third year of medical school students on 4-week rotations. Student-reported satisfaction in clinical neurology teaching improved from 43.9% (before) to 81.8% (after). The percentage of students matching into clinical neuroscience disciplines rose from 2% (before) to 6% (after). Conclusions: Our neurosciences curricular innovation increased graduating student satisfaction scores, had a mild positive impact on Step 2 Clinical Knowledge scores, and increased the number of students choosing careers in the clinical neurosciences. This model may be a consideration for other medical schools who wish to integrate neurosciences teaching throughout their curriculum.
机译:目标:为了培养未来的神经科医生和翻译神经科学家,我们在整个医学院课程中创建了一条神经科学途径,包括尽早接触临床神经科学决策,并为以后的临床神经科学经验选择增加了多样性。方法:我们的课程创新包括三个部分:(1)在医学院(COM)医学院第一年将基本的神经科学内容整合到明确的临床环境中; (2)在医学院第二年级扩展与神经科学有关的病理生理学原理; (3)在医学院第三年开设各种为期三周的临床神经科学选修课,并在医学院第四年为感兴趣的学习者提供为期四周的选修课/实习。评估了这些新变化(1)通过比较国家标准考试,包括选择临床神经科学选修课的学生的神经科主题考试成绩; (2)通过学生满意度调查问卷; (3)根据我们在美国神经科学学科中匹配的毕业生总数。结果:进行神经科学选择的学生表现出向第二步临床知识得分更高的趋势。学生的神经学科目考试成绩与全国其他美国COM COM医学院三年级学生每4周轮换一次的分数相当。学生报告的临床神经病学教学满意度从43.9%(之前)提高到81.8%(之后)。符合临床神经科学专业的学生比例从2%(之前)提高到6%(之后)。结论:我们的神经科学课程创新提高了毕业学生的满意度得分,对第2步临床知识得分产生了轻微的积极影响,并增加了在临床神经科学领域选择职业的学生人数。对于希望在其整个课程中整合神经科学教学的其他医学院校,可以考虑使用此模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号