首页> 外文期刊>The New Phytologist >Where does the carbon go? A model-data intercomparison of vegetation carbon allocation and turnover processes at two temperate forest free-air CO2 enrichment sites
【24h】

Where does the carbon go? A model-data intercomparison of vegetation carbon allocation and turnover processes at two temperate forest free-air CO2 enrichment sites

机译:碳去哪里了?两个温带森林自由空气CO2富集点植被碳分配和周转过程的模型数据比对

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration (eCO(2)) has the potential to increase vegetation carbon storage if increased net primary production causes increased long-lived biomass. Model predictions of eCO(2) effects on vegetation carbon storage depend on how allocation and turnover processes are represented. We used data from two temperate forest free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments to evaluate representations of allocation and turnover in 11 ecosystem models. Observed eCO(2) effects on allocation were dynamic. Allocation schemes based on functional relationships among biomass fractions that vary with resource availability were best able to capture the general features of the observations. Allocation schemes based on constant fractions or resource limitations performed less well, with some models having unintended outcomes. Few models represent turnover processes mechanistically and there was wide variation in predictions of tissue lifespan. Consequently, models did not perform well at predicting eCO(2) effects on vegetation carbon storage. Our recommendations to reduce uncertainty include: use of allocation schemes constrained by biomass fractions; careful testing of allocation schemes; and synthesis of allocation and turnover data in terms of model parameters. Data from intensively studied ecosystem manipulation experiments are invaluable for constraining models and we recommend that such experiments should attempt to fully quantify carbon, water and nutrient budgets
机译:如果增加的净初级生产力导致增加的长寿命生物量,那么大气中的二氧化碳浓度升高(eCO(2))有可能增加植被的碳存储量。 eCO(2)对植被碳存储的影响的模型预测取决于如何表示分配和周转过程。我们使用来自两个温带森林自由空气CO2富集(FACE)实验的数据来评估11种生态系统模型中的分配和周转量。观察到的eCO(2)对分配的影响是动态的。基于随资源可用性而变化的生物质部分之间的功能关系的分配方案最能捕获观测的一般特征。基于恒定分数或资源限制的分配方案效果较差,某些模型的结果出乎意料。很少有模型以机械方式代表周转过程,并且组织寿命的预测差异很大。因此,模型在预测eCO(2)对植被碳存储的影响方面表现不佳。我们减少不确定性的建议包括:使用受生物质分数限制的分配方案;仔细测试分配方案;并根据模型参数综合分配和营业额数据。经过深入研究的生态系统操作实验的数据对于约束模型非常有用,我们建议此类实验应尝试完全量化碳,水和养分预算

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号