Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration (eCO2) has the potential to increase'/> Where does the carbon go? A model–data intercomparison of vegetation carbonallocation and turnover processes at two temperate forest free-air CO2 enrichmentsites
首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley-Blackwell Online Open >Where does the carbon go? A model–data intercomparison of vegetation carbonallocation and turnover processes at two temperate forest free-air CO2 enrichmentsites
【2h】

Where does the carbon go? A model–data intercomparison of vegetation carbonallocation and turnover processes at two temperate forest free-air CO2 enrichmentsites

机译:碳去哪里了?植被碳的模型-数据比对两个温带森林空气CO2富集的分配和周转过程网站

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

class="unordered" style="list-style-type:disc">Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration (eCO2) has the potential to increase vegetation carbon storage if increased net primary production causes increased long-lived biomass. Model predictions of eCO2 effects on vegetation carbon storage depend on how allocation and turnover processes are represented.We used data from two temperate forest free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments to evaluate representations of allocation and turnover in 11 ecosystem models.Observed eCO2 effects on allocation were dynamic. Allocation schemes based on functional relationships among biomass fractions that vary with resource availability were best able to capture the general features of the observations. Allocation schemes based on constant fractions or resource limitations performed less well, with some models having unintended outcomes. Few models represent turnover processes mechanistically and there was wide variation in predictions of tissue lifespan. Consequently, models did not perform well at predicting eCO2 effects on vegetation carbon storage.Our recommendations to reduce uncertainty include: use of allocation schemes constrained by biomass fractions; careful testing of allocation schemes; and synthesis of allocation and turnoverdata in terms of model parameters. Data from intensively studied ecosystem manipulation experimentsare invaluable for constraining models and we recommend that such experiments should attempt tofully quantify carbon, water and nutrient budgets.
机译:class =“ unordered” style =“ list-style-type:disc”> <!-list-behavior = unordered prefix-word = mark-type = disc max-label-size = 0-> 如果增加的主要净产量导致增加的长寿命生物量,那么大气中的二氧化碳浓度(eCO2)升高有可能增加植被碳储量。 eCO2对植被碳储量影响的模型预测取决于分配和周转过程的表示方式。 我们使用来自两个温带森林自由空气CO2富集(FACE)实验的数据来评估植物中碳和分配的变化。 11种生态系统模型。 观察到的eCO2对分配的影响是动态的。基于随资源可用性而变化的生物质部分之间的功能关系的分配方案最能够捕获观测的一般特征。基于恒定分数或资源限制的分配方案效果较差,某些模型的结果出乎意料。很少有模型以机械方式代表周转过程,并且组织寿命的预测差异很大。因此,模型在预测eCO2对植被碳储量的影响方面效果不佳。 我们为减少不确定性而提出的建议包括:使用受生物质分数约束的分配方案;仔细测试分配方案;和营业额的综合模型参数方面的数据。来自深入研究的生态系统操作实验的数据对于约束模型而言是无价的,我们建议此类实验应尝试完全量化碳,水和养分的预算。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号