首页> 外文期刊>The New England journal of medicine >Health care reform--what went wrong on the way to the courthouse.
【24h】

Health care reform--what went wrong on the way to the courthouse.

机译:医疗改革-通往法院的路上出了什么问题。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Before health care reform was enacted, Democratic lawmakers and most legal scholars were confident of its constitutionality. Under long-established Supreme Court precedent, Congress would have authority, if it wanted, to enact a single-payer socialized insurance system, us- ing its powers to tax and spend "for the general welfare." Far short of such a system, the complex blend of regulation, subsidies, and an individual mandate included in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is vastly more protective of insurance markets and individual freedoms. Congress has nearly unbridled authority to regulate products sold in or affecting interstate commerce, and health insurance is one such product. And given the economics of health insurance, a mandate to purchase insurance is integral to regulating how insurers design, price, and sell their products.
机译:在医疗保健改革实施之前,民主党议员和大多数法律学者都对它的合宪性充满信心。根据历史悠久的最高法院判例,如果国会愿意,国会有权制定单一付款人社会保险制度,利用其征税和“为普通福利”支出的权力。远远没有这样的系统,《可负担医疗法案》(ACA)中包含的法规,补贴和个人授权的复杂结合,极大地保护了保险市场和个人自由。国会拥有几乎不受限制的权力来规范在州际贸易中销售或影响州际贸易的产品,而健康保险就是其中之一。考虑到健康保险的经济性,购买保险的要求对于规范保险公司如何设计,定价和销售产品是必不可少的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号