...
首页> 外文期刊>The New England journal of medicine >Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller's myotomy for idiopathic achalasia.
【24h】

Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller's myotomy for idiopathic achalasia.

机译:气动扩张与腹腔镜海勒氏肌切开术治疗特发性门失弛缓症。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Many experts consider laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM) to be superior to pneumatic dilation for the treatment of achalasia, and LHM is increasingly considered to be the treatment of choice for this disorder. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed achalasia to pneumatic dilation or LHM with Dor's fundoplication. Symptoms, including weight loss, dysphagia, retrosternal pain, and regurgitation, were assessed with the use of the Eckardt score (which ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more pronounced symptoms). The primary outcome was therapeutic success (a drop in the Eckardt score to
机译:背景:许多专家认为腹腔镜海勒氏肌切开术(LHM)优于气管扩张术用于门失弛缓症的治疗,越来越多的人认为LHM是该疾病的首选治疗方法。方法:我们将刚诊断为门失弛缓症的患者随机分配为具有Dor胃底折叠术的气管扩张术或LHM。症状包括体重减轻,吞咽困难,胸骨后疼痛和反流,使用Eckardt评分(范围为0到12,评分越高,表明症状越明显)进行评估。年度随访评估的主要结果是治疗成功(Eckardt评分下降至

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号