首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of trauma >Differences in prescription of narcotic pain medication after operative treatment of hip and ankle fractures in the United States and The Netherlands.
【24h】

Differences in prescription of narcotic pain medication after operative treatment of hip and ankle fractures in the United States and The Netherlands.

机译:在美国和荷兰,对髋部和踝部骨折进行手术治疗后,麻醉性止痛药的处方差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Interactions between American and Dutch surgeons suggested differences in prescription habits for pain medication after fracture treatment. METHODS: The percentages of 190 American [100 after hip open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and 90 after ankle ORIF] and 116 Dutch patients (69 after hip ORIF and 47 after ankle ORIF) receiving inpatient and outpatient prescriptions for narcotics were retrospectively compared between countries, to test the hypothesis that narcotics are prescribed more frequently in the United States as compared with The Netherlands after operative fracture treatment. RESULTS: Among patients with hip fractures, 85% of American and 58% of Dutch patients were prescribed narcotics during hospitalization (p < 0.001). After discharge, 77% of American and none of the Dutch patients were prescribed narcotics (p < 0.001). The multivariate model including country accounted for 11% of the variation in inpatient narcotic prescription (p < 0.001), and the model including country and surgeon accounted for 55% of the variation in outpatient narcotic prescription (p < 0.001). Among patients with ankle fracture, 98% of American and 64% of Dutch patients were prescribed narcotics during hospitalization (p < 0.001). After discharge, 82% of American patients and 6% of Dutch patients were prescribed narcotics (p < 0.001). Predictors included country and surgeon and they accounted for 20% of the variation in inpatient narcotics prescription (p < 0.001) and 49% of the variation in outpatient narcotic prescription (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: American patients are prescribed significantly more inpatient and outpatient narcotic pain medication than Dutch patients after operative treatment of hip and ankle fractures.
机译:背景:美国和荷兰外科医生之间的相互作用表明,骨折治疗后止痛药的处方习惯存在差异。方法:回顾性比较接受住院和门诊麻醉处方的190名美国人[髋部开放及内固定术(ORIF)后100例和踝部ORIF后90例]和116名荷兰人(接受髋部ORIF后69例,踝部ORIF后47例)的百分比在国家之间进行比较,以检验以下假设:在进行骨折手术治疗后,与荷兰相比,美国开处方麻醉药的频率更高。结果:在髋部骨折患者中,有85%的美国人和58%的荷兰人患者在住院期间开了麻醉药(p <0.001)。出院后,有77%的美国患者和所有荷兰患者均未处方麻醉剂(p <0.001)。包括国家在内的多变量模型占住院患者麻醉处方变化的11%(p <0.001),包括国家和医生在内的多变量模型占门诊麻醉处方变化的55%(p <0.001)。在踝部骨折患者中,有98%的美国患者和64%的荷兰患者在住院期间开了麻醉药(p <0.001)。出院后,有82%的美国患者和6%的荷兰患者使用了麻醉剂(p <0.001)。预测因素包括国家和外科医生,它们占住院患者麻醉处方变化的20%(p <0.001)和占住院患者麻醉处方变化的49%(p <0.001)。结论:在对髋部和踝部骨折进行手术治疗之后,美国患者的住院和门诊麻醉性止痛药的处方量明​​显多于荷兰患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号