首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of trauma >Plating of femoral shaft fractures: open reduction and internal fixation versus submuscular fixation.
【24h】

Plating of femoral shaft fractures: open reduction and internal fixation versus submuscular fixation.

机译:股骨干骨折的电镀:切开复位内固定与肌下固定。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for femoral shaft fractures is intramedullary nailing. However, there are indications for which plating can be performed either openly or in a submuscular manner. METHODS: Between June 1996 and May 2002, two fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons treated 40 acute diaphyseal femoral fractures in 37 patients with use of plating techniques. Traditional open plating with emphasis on preservation of soft tissue integrity was performed exclusively before February 1999 (n = 19). After that time point, in all but one case (n = 21) submuscular plating techniques were used. No bone grafting was used for either group. A comparison of reduction quality, union rates, secondary interventions, and infection rates between traditional open reduction and internal fixation and submuscular fixation was performed (retrospective cohort study/evidence-based medicine (EBM)-level III). RESULTS: In assessing reduction quality, there were no malreductions in the traditional plating groupand six in the submuscular plating group. There was one infection and one nonunion in the open reduction or internal fixation group. One infection was noted in the submuscular group. CONCLUSIONS: A 2.5% incidence of nonunion and a 5% incidence of infection (2 of 40; both in type III open fractures) were seen in this series of 40 femoral shaft fractures treated with plate application. Although the theoretical advantages of submuscular plating are well established, its utilization in the femoral shaft did not have a clear clinical advantage. In addition, its use appears to be more technically challenging, and is associated with a high rate of suboptimal reductions.
机译:背景:股骨干骨折的标准治疗方法是髓内钉。但是,有迹象表明可以公开或以肌肉下方式进行电镀。方法:在1996年6月至2002年5月之间,两名接受过进修培训的骨科创伤外科医师采用电镀技术治疗了37例急性干phy端股骨骨折。传统的开放式镀层强调保留软组织的完整性,是在1999年2月之前专门进行的(n = 19)。在该时间点之后,除一种情况(n = 21)外,均使用了肌肉注射技术。两组均未使用植骨。进行了传统开放切开术和内固定术与肌肉下固定术之间的复位质量,联合率,二次干预和感染率的比较(回顾性队列研究/循证医学(EBM)III级)。结果:在评估复位质量时,传统钢板组未见不良复位,而肌肉下钢板组有6枚复位不良。切开复位或内固定组有1例感染和1例不愈合。在肌肉下组中发现一种感染。结论:在该系列应用钢板治疗的40例股骨干骨折中,发现骨不连的发生率为2.5%,感染的发生率为5%(40例中有2例;均在III型开放性骨折中)。尽管肌肉下钢板的理论优势已经确立,但是其在股骨干中的应用并没有明显的临床优势。另外,其使用似乎在技术上更具挑战性,并且与次优减少率高相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号