首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of trauma >Nonoperative treatment of multiple intra-abdominal solid organ injury after blunt abdominal trauma.
【24h】

Nonoperative treatment of multiple intra-abdominal solid organ injury after blunt abdominal trauma.

机译:钝性腹部外伤后非手术治疗多发性腹腔内实体器官损伤。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: A number of large series' have attempted to examine the management of blunt solid organ injuries; however, only a few studies regarding multiple injuries exist. The aim of this study is to analyze whether multiple solid organ injury affects nonoperative management (NOM) and to look for predictive factors of NOM. METHODS: All patients admitted with a diagnosis of blunt solid organ injury between January 1, 1999 and January 1, 2005 were included in this prospective observational study. Of the 468 patients who had solid organ injury, 46 patients met the inclusion criteria of multiple solid organ injuries. Presentation, mechanism of injury, injury grade, Abbreviated Injury Scale score, management, and outcomes were analyzed. Independent predictive factors of NOM failure were identified. Patients managed nonoperatively were compared with patients who had had emergent laparotomy and patients for whom NOM failed. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (33%) underwent emergency laparotomy because of hypovolemicshock that was unresponsive to aggressive resuscitation, and 31 (66%) were selected for NOM. Among the 31 patients, NOM was successful in 23 (75%). No specific organ injury combination was found to affect NOM failure. Admission lactate level [odds ratio(OR), 1.44; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05-1.98; p = 0.025], a drop in the hematocrit greater than 20% in the first hour after admission (OR, 1.13; 95% confidence interval CI, 1.04-1.24; p = 0.007), and solid viscus score (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.03-2.80; p = 0.04) were significant independent risk factors in those patients for whom NOM failed. In logistic regression analysis, hypotension at admission (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92-0.99; p = 0.014) and transfusion in the first 6 hours after admission (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.05; p 0.015) were found to significantly affect the success rate of nonoperative management. CONCLUSION: Lactate levels at admission, solid viscus score, necessity of transfusion, crystalloid resuscitation, and a drop in the hematocrit in the first hour after admission are useful parameters for judging the failure of NOM. Although there is a higher failure rate of NOM in multiple solid organ injury, NOM can still be considered in these cases with extra caution.
机译:背景:许多大型研究试图检验钝性实体器官损伤的处理。但是,关于多处伤害的研究很少。这项研究的目的是分析多发性实体器官损伤是否会影响非手术治疗(NOM)并寻找NOM的预测因素。方法:所有前瞻性观察性研究均纳入了1999年1月1日至2005年1月1日之间被确诊为钝性实体器官损伤的所有患者。在468例实体器官损伤患者中,有46例符合多实体器官损伤的纳入标准。分析了表现,损伤机制,损伤等级,简化损伤量表评分,管理和结果。确定了NOM失败的独立预测因素。将非手术治疗的患者与急诊剖腹手术和NOM失败的患者进行比较。结果:15例患者(33%)因低血容量性休克对积极复苏无反应而进行了紧急剖腹手术,并选择了31例(66%)进行NOM。在31例患者中,有23例(75%)NOM成功。没有发现特定的器官损伤组合会影响NOM失败。入院乳酸水平[比值比(OR),1.44; 95%置信区间(CI),1.05-1.98; p = 0.025],入院后第一小时血细胞比容下降大于20%(OR,1.13; 95%置信区间CI,1.04-1.24; p = 0.007),内脏粘液分数(OR,1.67; 95) %CI,1.03-2.80; p = 0.04)是那些NOM失败的患者的重要独立危险因素。在逻辑回归分析中,入院时出现低血压(OR,0.96; 95%CI,0.92-0.99; p = 0.014),入院后前6小时输血(OR,1.03; 95%CI,1.00-1.05; p 0.015)被发现会显着影响非手术治疗的成功率。结论:入院后第一小时入院时的乳酸水平,固体粘度评分,输血的必要性,晶体复苏和血细胞比容下降是判断NOM失败的有用参数。尽管多发性实体器官损伤中NOM的失败率更高,但在这些情况下仍可考虑使用NOM,但要格外小心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号