...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of trauma >Proximal femoral nail for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures compared with gamma nail.
【24h】

Proximal femoral nail for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures compared with gamma nail.

机译:与伽马钉相比,股骨近端钉治疗股骨转子间倾斜后倾骨折。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The reverse obliquity fracture of the proximal femur (AO/OTA 31-A3) is mechanically different from most intertrochanteric fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of proximal femoral nail (PFN) fixation with those of gamma nail (GN) fixation for these fractures. METHODS: Between 1993 and 2003, 635 of the fractures were classified as intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric. Clinical and radiographic records were retrospectively reviewed, and 22 fractures with reverse obliquity pattern were identified. The patients were divided into two treatment groups and were followed up for a minimum of 1 year (range, 12-67 months). Eleven patients in group I were treated with the PFN, and 11 patients in group II were treated with the GN. The two groups were comparable with regard to demographic and injury variables. The duration of follow-up averaged 18 months (range, 12-67 months). Radiographic changes during the follow-up, clinical outcome, and complications of the PFN group were compared with those of the GN group. RESULTS: Reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures accounted for 4.3% of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. Bone union time averaged 16.5 weeks in the PFN group and 17.9 weeks in the GN group. Average sliding of lag screw was 2.5 mm in the PFN group and 3.1 mm in the GN group (p = 0.046). Change of the neck-shaft angle was 2.45 degrees in the PFN group and 3.75 degrees in the GN group (p = 0.032). A satisfactory functional outcome was found in eight patients in the PFN group and also in eight patients in the GN group. There was one osteonecrosis of femoral head in the PFN group. There was one cutting out of lag screw, one nonunion, and one varus deformity in the GN group. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in clinical outcome between the PFN and GN groups. However, the PFN demonstrated better results biomechanically than the GN did in terms of less sliding of lag screw, less change of neck-shaft angle, and less complications for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures.
机译:背景:股骨近端反向倾斜骨折(AO / OTA 31-A3)在机械上不同于大多数股骨转子间骨折。本研究的目的是比较股骨近端钉(PFN)与伽玛钉(GN)固定治疗这些骨折的结果。方法:在1993年至2003年之间,有635例骨折被归类为转子间或转子下。回顾性审查临床和影像学记录,并鉴定出22例具有倾斜后倾型骨折。将患者分为两个治疗组,并随访至少1年(范围12-67个月)。 I组的11例患者接受PFN治疗,II组的11例患者接受GN治疗。两组在人口统计学和伤害变量方面具有可比性。随访时间平均为18个月(范围12-67个月)。将PFN组的随访,临床结果和并发症的影像学变化与GN组进行比较。结果:倒斜转子间粗隆间骨折占股骨粗隆间和粗隆间骨折的4.3%。 PFN组平均骨愈合时间为16.5周,GN组平均为17.9周。 PFN组的方头螺钉平均滑动为2.5 mm,GN组的方头螺钉平均滑动为3.1 mm(p = 0.046)。 PFN组的颈轴角变化为2.45度,GN组的颈轴角变化为3.75度(p = 0.032)。 PFN组的8例患者和GN组的8例患者均获得满意的功能预后。 PFN组有1例股骨头坏死。在GN组中,有一个切除了方头螺钉,一个骨不连和一个内翻畸形。结论:PFN组和GN组之间的临床结局无差异。然而,PFN在生物力学上比GN表现出更好的结果,这是因为拉力螺钉的滑动更少,颈轴角度的变化更少以及用于治疗后倾角转子间骨折的并发症更少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号