...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of trauma >Autopsy data in the peer review process improves outcomes analysis.
【24h】

Autopsy data in the peer review process improves outcomes analysis.

机译:同行评审过程中的尸检数据可改善结果分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: The value of autopsy findings has been questioned in peer review at mature trauma centers. We sought to determine the impact of autopsy data on the peer-review process. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. Data analyzed included mortality type (immediate/dead on arrival [DOA]; early [< or =48 hours]; late [>48 hours]), Injury Severity Scale (ISS) score, Trauma and Injury Severity Score-generated probability of survival (PS), peer-review judgment of preventability, and findings at autopsy. Deaths were assigned to a category; then pre- and postautopsy ISS score, PS, and outcomes of the peer- review process (percent nonpreventable [%NP]) were compared. Paired t tests (alpha = 0.05) were performed to determine whether changes in ISS score and PS were statistically significant. All descriptive and inferential analyses were based on cases with pre- and postautopsy data for the relevant variables. RESULTS: Of the 170 deaths, 126 deaths had an autopsy performed (74.1%) and 112 autopsy reports were available (89.9%). Autopsy data resulted in statistically significant changes in ISS score for each mortality category and in PS for the immediate/DOA and early categories. There were also autopsy- related changes in peer-review outcomes for immediate/DOA and late deaths but not for early deaths. The proportion of overall agreement between pre- and postautopsy outcomes for the immediate/DOA category was 94.3% (50/53); three deaths initially deemed NP were reclassified as potentially preventable (PP) after autopsy. Overall agreement for the late category was 87% (20/23); one PP was reclassified as NP and two NPs were reclassified as PP. CONCLUSION: Autopsy data enhanced peer review in immediate/DOA and late death after injury but did not impact peer review in early deaths. Autopsy data were most important to the analysis of late deaths. Targeting autopsy performance to these mortality categories is an effective strategy for centers with constrained access to autopsy data.
机译:背景:尸检结果的价值已在成熟创伤中心的同行评审中受到质疑。我们试图确定尸检数据对同行评审过程的影响。方法:这是一项回顾性研究。分析的数据包括死亡率类型(到达时的立即/死亡[DOA];早期[<或= 48小时];晚期[> 48小时]),伤害严重度量表(ISS)评分,创伤和伤害严重度评分生成的生存概率(PS),可预防性的同行评审以及尸检时的发现。死亡被归为一个类别。然后比较尸检前后的ISS评分,PS和同行评审过程的结果(不可预防的百分比[%NP])。进行配对t检验(α= 0.05)以确定ISS得分和PS的变化是否具有统计学意义。所有描述性和推论性分析均基于具有相关变量的尸检前后数据的病例。结果:在170例死亡中,有126例进行了尸检(74.1%),有112例尸检报告(89.9%)。尸检数据导致每个死亡率类别的ISS得分在统计上显着变化,而立即/ DOA和早期类别的PS发生统计变化。对于立即/ DOA和晚期死亡,但对于早期死亡,同行评审结果也与尸检有关。立即/ DOA类别的尸检前后结果总体一致的比例为94.3%(50/53);尸检后,最初被认为是NP的三例死亡被重新分类为潜在可预防(PP)。后期类别的总体协议为87%(20/23);将一个PP重新分类为NP,将两个NP重新分类为PP。结论:尸检数据增强了立即/ DOA和受伤后晚期死亡的同行评审,但并未影响早期死亡的同行评审。尸检数据对于分析晚期死亡最为重要。针对这些死亡率类别,将尸检表现作为目标是对于限制访问尸检数据的中心的有效策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号