首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of trauma >Specific abbreviated injury scale values are responsible for the underestimation of mortality in penetrating trauma patients by the injury severity score.
【24h】

Specific abbreviated injury scale values are responsible for the underestimation of mortality in penetrating trauma patients by the injury severity score.

机译:特定的缩写伤害量表值导致伤害严重程度得分低估了穿透性创伤患者的死亡率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The Injury Severity Score (ISS) is widely used as a method for rating severity of injury. The ISS is the sum of the squares of the three worst Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) values from three body regions. Patients with penetrating injuries tend to have higher mortality rates for a given ISS than patients with blunt injuries. This is thought to be secondary to the increased prevalence of multiple severe injuries in the same body region in patients with penetrating injuries, which the ISS does not account for. We hypothesized that the mechanism-based difference in mortality could be attributed to certain ISS ranges and specific AIS values by body region. METHODS: Outcome and injury scoring data were obtained from transfused patients admitted to 23 Level I trauma centers. ISS values were grouped into categories, and a logistic regression model was created. Mortality for each ISS category was determined and compared with the ISS 1 to 15 group. An interaction term was added to evaluate the effect of mechanism. Additional logistic regression models were created to examine each AIS category individually. RESULTS: There were 2,292 patients in the cohort. An overall interaction between ISS and mechanism was observed (p = 0.049). Mortality rates between blunt and penetrating patients with an ISS between 25 and 40 were significantly different (23.6 vs. 36.1%; p = 0.022). Within this range, the magnitude of the difference in mortality was far higher for penetrating patients with head injuries (75% vs. 37% for blunt) than truncal injuries (26% vs. 17% for blunt). Penetrating trauma patients with an AIS head of 4 or 5, AIS abdomen of 3, or AIS extremity of 3 all had adjusted mortality rates higher than blunt trauma patients with those values. CONCLUSION: Significant differences in mortality between blunt and penetrating trauma patients exist at certain ISS and AIS category values. The mortality difference is greatest for head injured patients.
机译:背景:损伤严重程度评分(ISS)被广泛用作评估损伤严重程度的方法。 ISS是来自三个身体区域的三个最差的简短伤害量表(AIS)值的平方和。对于给定的ISS,穿透性损伤患者的死亡率往往比钝性损伤患者更高。据认为,这是继发性损伤患者在同一身体部位发生多处严重损伤的流行的继发原因,而国际空间站并未对此进行解释。我们假设死亡率的基于机制的差异可能归因于某些ISS范围和身体部位的特定AIS值。方法:从23个I级创伤中心的输血患者获得结果和损伤评分数据。 ISS值分为几类,并创建了逻辑回归模型。确定每个ISS类别的死亡率,并将其与ISS 1至15组进行比较。添加了一个交互项来评估该机制的效果。创建了其他逻辑回归模型以分别检查每个AIS类别。结果:该队列共有2292例患者。观察到国际空间站与机制之间的整体相互作用(p = 0.049)。 ISS在25至40之间的钝性和穿透性患者之间的死亡率有显着差异(23.6%vs. 36.1%; p = 0.022)。在此范围内,穿透性颅脑损伤患者的死亡率差异幅度要大得多(钝器为75%,钝器为37%),而截肢性损伤为26%,钝器为17%。 AIS头为4或5,AIS腹部为3或AIS肢体为3的穿透性创伤患者的调整死亡率均高于具有这些值的钝性创伤患者。结论:在某些ISS和AIS类别值下,钝性和穿透性创伤患者之间的死亡率存在显着差异。头部受伤患者的死亡率差异最大。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号