首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery >Characterization and outcome of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis referred for percutaneous aortic valve replacement.
【24h】

Characterization and outcome of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis referred for percutaneous aortic valve replacement.

机译:严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄的患者的特征和转归,建议经皮主动脉瓣置换。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Many high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis are not referred for surgical aortic valve replacement. Although this patient population remains ill-defined, many of these patients are now being referred for percutaneous aortic valve replacement. We sought to define the characteristics and outcomes of patients referred for percutaneous aortic valve replacement. METHODS: Between February 2006 and March 2007, 92 patients were screened for percutaneous aortic valve replacement. Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement, percutaneous aortic valve replacement, balloon aortic valvuloplasty, or no intervention were compared. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Nineteen patients underwent successful surgical aortic valve replacement, 18 patients underwent percutaneous aortic valve replacement, and 36 patients had no intervention. Thirty patients underwent balloon aortic valvuloplasty, and of these, 8 patients were bridged to percutaneous aortic valve replacement and 3 were bridged to surgical aortic valve replacement. Of the remaining 19 patients undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty, bridging to percutaneous aortic valve replacement could not be accomplished because of death (n = 9 [47%)], exclusion from the percutaneous aortic valve replacement protocol (n = 6 [32%]), and some patients improved after balloon aortic valvuloplasty and declined percutaneous aortic valve replacement (n = 4 [21%]). The most common reasons for no intervention included death while awaiting definitive treatment (n = 10 [28%]), patient uninterested in percutaneous aortic valve replacement (n = 10 [28%]), and questionable severity of symptoms or aortic stenosis (n = 9 [25%]). Patients not undergoing aortic valve replacement had higher mortality compared with those undergoing aortic valve replacement (44% vs 14%) over a mean duration of 220 days. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis have high mortality if timely aortic valve replacement is not feasible. Twenty percent of the patients referred for percutaneous aortic valve replacement underwent surgical aortic valve replacement with good outcome. Patients undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty alone or no intervention had unfavorable outcomes.
机译:目的:许多严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄的高危患者没有被推荐进行外科主动脉瓣置换术。尽管该患者人群仍然不确定,但是现在许多此类患者因经皮主动脉瓣置换而被转诊。我们试图确定经皮主动脉瓣置换患者的特征和结果。方法:2006年2月至2007年3月,对92例经皮主动脉瓣置换术进行了筛查。比较了接受外科主动脉瓣置换,经皮主动脉瓣置换,球囊主动脉瓣膜成形术或不进行干预的患者的临床和超声心动图特征。主要终点是全因死亡率。结果:19例患者接受了成功的手术主动脉瓣置换术,18例患者进行了经皮主动脉瓣置换术,36例患者未进行干预。 30例患者接受了球囊主动脉瓣膜成形术,其中,8例桥接经皮主动脉瓣置换术,3例桥接外科主动脉瓣置换术。在其余19例接受球囊主动脉瓣膜成形术的患者中,由于死亡无法桥接至经皮主动脉瓣置换术(n = 9 [47%)],不包括经皮主动脉瓣膜置换术(n = 6 [32%]) ,有些患者在球囊主动脉瓣膜成形术后好转,而经皮主动脉瓣置换术下降(n = 4 [21%])。没有干预的最常见原因包括:等待最终治疗时死亡(n = 10 [28%]),对经皮主动脉瓣置换不感兴趣的患者(n = 10 [28%])以及症状或主动脉瓣狭窄的严重程度值得怀疑(n = 9 [25%])。与未进行主动脉瓣置换术的患者相比,在220天的平均持续时间内,患者的死亡率较高(分别为44%和14%)。结论:如果不及时更换主动脉瓣膜,症状严重的主动脉瓣狭窄患者死亡率较高。接受过经皮主动脉瓣置换术的患者中有20%接受了手术性主动脉瓣置换术,效果良好。单独进行球囊主动脉瓣成形术或不进行干预的患者预后不良。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号