...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery >Temporary right ventricular mechanical circulatory support for the management of right ventricular failure in critically ill patients
【24h】

Temporary right ventricular mechanical circulatory support for the management of right ventricular failure in critically ill patients

机译:临时性右心室机械循环支持对危重患者右心室衰竭的处理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Management of right ventricular (RV) failure after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is not evidence based. Temporary circulatory assistance has recently been reported to be of value for managing postoperative RV failure after LVAD implantation, but only in small series of patients or isolated case reports. We report here our experience with the use of temporary right ventricular assist devices (RVADs) in LVAD recipients. Methods: Forty-five of the 488 (9%) patients undergoing LVAD implantation between 2001 and 2011 at the Clinic for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery in Bad Oeynhausen had RV failure requiring temporary RVAD. We analyzed preoperative data, complications, mortality at 6 months, and risk factors of death. Results: The LVAD patients receiving temporary RVAD were younger than the 443 recipients of LVAD alone. They were more likely to have mechanical ventilation and haemofiltration and their Michigan right ventricular risk score was higher. The LVAD patients with temporary RVAD had a higher mortality at 6 months: 53%, versus 25% for patients receiving LVAD only (P <.001). The univariate risk factors for death were high blood urea nitrogen and C-reactive protein concentrations, preoperative mechanical ventilation, preoperative hemofiltration, destination therapy, the use of temporary RVAD, and the development of RV failure. Multivariate analyses did not identify predictors of death. Conclusions: The development of RV failure in LVAD recipients is a serious problem associated with high mortality. Temporary RV mechanical support is an acceptable way to manage postoperative RV failure in these severely ill LVAD recipients.
机译:背景:左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入后右心室(RV)衰竭的治疗并非基于证据。最近有报道称,临时循环辅助对LVAD植入后术后RV衰竭的治疗很有价值,但仅在少数患者或个别病例报告中有效。我们在这里报告我们在LVAD接受者中使用临时右心室辅助设备(RVAD)的经验。方法:2001年至2011年在Bad Oeynhausen胸腔和心血管外科诊所接受LVAD植入术的488名患者中,有45名(9%)出现RV衰竭,需要临时RVAD。我们分析了术前数据,并发症,6个月时的死亡率以及死亡的危险因素。结果:接受临时RVAD的LVAD患者比仅接受443位LVAD的患者年轻。他们更有可能进行机械通气和血液滤过,他们的密歇根州右心室风险评分更高。暂时性RVAD的LVAD患者在6个月时死亡率更高:53%,而仅接受LVAD的患者为25%(P <.001)。死亡的单因素风险因素是高血尿素氮和C反应蛋白浓度,术前机械通气,术前血液滤过,目的地治疗,使用临时RVAD和发生RV衰竭。多变量分析未发现死亡的预测因素。结论:LVAD接受者右室衰竭的发生是与高死亡率相关的严重问题。在这些重症LVAD患者中,临时RV机械支持是处理术后RV衰竭的可接受方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号