首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery >Hemi-aortic arch debranching for hybrid aortic arch repair by sequential transposition of the left common carotid and subclavian arteries
【24h】

Hemi-aortic arch debranching for hybrid aortic arch repair by sequential transposition of the left common carotid and subclavian arteries

机译:半主动脉弓脱支,通过左颈总动脉和锁骨下动脉的顺次换位修复混合主动脉弓

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the short-term and midterm results after hemi-aortic arch debranching for hybrid aortic arch repair by sequential transposition of the left common carotid artery and of the left subclavian artery. Methods: From November 1998 to August 2011, 11 patients underwent a hybrid technique with supra-aortic debranching (by sequential transposition of the left common carotid artery and of the left subclavian) and simultaneous endovascular stent grafting for zone 1 lesions. There were 8 men and 3 women (mean age, 62.9 ?? 20.9 years; range, 15-89 years). Aortic arch lesions treated included 4 complicated aortic dissections, 3 degenerative aneurysms, 2 postcoarctectomy aortic pseudoaneurysms, 1 mycotic aneurysm, and 1 traumatic transection of the arch. Four (36%) operations were performed in an emergency setting. Results: Endovascular exclusion success was achieved in 90.9% of the patients (type I endoleak: 1/11). One iliac artery rupture occurred intraoperatively. The 30-day mortality rate was 0%. Overall actuarial survival was 82% and 71.8% at 1 and 2 years. Mean follow-up is 31 ?? 25 months (range, 3-72 months). No instance of permanent cerebral or spinal cord ischemia was observed. Two type II endoleaks are currently observed. There was no device migration. Conclusions: Hybrid aortic arch repair by sequential transposition of the left common carotid artery and of the left subclavian artery for zone 1 lesions provides an attractive alternative for treating hemi-aortic arch lesions in high-risk patients with minimal atherosclerotic disease in the aorta and great vessels with acceptable primary results and encouraging midterm efficacy to prevent rupture. This hybrid strategy avoiding prosthetic bypass offers several advantages over conventional repair, including the potential to treat patients who are not candidates for open repair and single-stage treatment of some pathologic conditions previously requiring 2-stage repair.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是通过顺序移位左颈总动脉和左锁骨下动脉,评估半主动脉弓脱支修复混合主动脉弓后的短期和中期结果。方法:从1998年11月至2011年8月,对11例患者进行了一种混合技术,包括主动脉上分支术(通过顺序移位左颈总动脉和左锁骨下动脉)并同时行血管内支架植入1区病变。男8例,女3例(平均年龄62.9-20.9岁;范围15-89岁)。治疗的主动脉弓病变包括4个复杂的主动脉夹层,3个退行性动脉瘤,2个腔内切除术后主动脉假性动脉瘤,1个霉菌性动脉瘤和1个创伤性横断。在紧急情况下执行了四次(36%)操作。结果:90.9%的患者获得了血管内排除成功(I型内漏:1/11)。术中发生一动脉破裂。 30天死亡率为0%。在1年和2年时,总体精算生存率分别为82%和71.8%。平均随访时间为31 ?? 25个月(范围3-72个月)。没有观察到永久性脑或脊髓缺血的情况。当前观察到两种II型内漏。没有设备迁移。结论:通过顺序移位左颈总动脉和左锁骨下动脉来治疗1区病变的混合主动脉弓修复为高风险,主动脉动脉粥样硬化性病变少且高发的半主动脉弓病变提供了有吸引力的替代方法具有可接受的主要结果的血管,并具有中期预防破裂的功效。这种避免假体旁路的混合策略提供了优于常规修复的多个优势,包括可以治疗不适合进行开放性修复的患者以及对以前需要进行两阶段修复的某些病理状况进行单阶段治疗的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号