...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery >Stability of aortic annulus enlargement during aortic valve replacement using a bovine pericardial patch: An 18-year clinical, echocardiographic, and angio-computed tomographic follow-up
【24h】

Stability of aortic annulus enlargement during aortic valve replacement using a bovine pericardial patch: An 18-year clinical, echocardiographic, and angio-computed tomographic follow-up

机译:使用牛心包膜修补主动脉瓣膜期间主动脉瓣环扩大的稳定性:一项为期18年的临床,超声心动图和血管计算机断层扫描随访

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective: Enlargement of the aortic annulus may be required during aortic valve replacement to avoid patient-prosthesis mismatch. We reviewed patients with enlargement of the aortic annulus with the aim of assessing the stability of the procedure by means of echocardiographic and angio-computed tomography studies. Methods: A series of 53 consecutive patients underwent aortic valve replacement and enlargement of the aortic annulus from 1994 to 2012. The mean age was 68 ± 11 years (range, 29-84 years), and 85% (45 patients) were female. The predominant valvular lesion was aortic stenosis. The mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation was 11.2 ± 13.0. Enlargement of the aortic annulus was performed by extending the aortotomy incision to separate the commissure between the left and noncoronary sinuses into the anterior mitral leaflet and closing the resulting defect with an adequately tailored patch of bovine pericardium. Results: Hospital mortality was 2%, with 20 late deaths mostly due to noncardiac causes. At a maximum follow-up of 18 years (mean, 8.9 ± 5.0 years), actuarial survival is 37% ± 9%. No cases of severe patient-prosthesis mismatch were observed, and only 2 patients had moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch. At discharge, the mean aortic root diameter was 30.0 ± 2.3 mm and the mean diameter at the sinotubular junction was 31.5 ± 5.0 mm. At follow-up, the mean aortic root diameter was 31.0 ± 3.4 mm and the mean diameter at the sinotubular junction was 31.7 ± 4.5 mm (P = not significant) with no cases of late aneurysm formation on angio-computed tomography. Conclusions: Enlargement of the aortic annulus is a safe and effective procedure and should be indicated in patients with a small aortic annulus; particularly, it should be considered to prevent patient-prosthesis mismatch and its potential deleterious long-term effects.
机译:目的:在主动脉瓣置换过程中可能需要扩大主动脉瓣环,以避免患者与假体不匹配。我们回顾了主动脉瓣环扩大的患者,旨在通过超声心动图和血管计算机断层扫描研究评估手术的稳定性。方法:1994年至2012年,连续53例患者接受了主动脉瓣置换和主动脉瓣环扩大。平均年龄为68±11岁(范围29-84岁),其中85%为女性(45例)。瓣膜病变主要是主动脉瓣狭窄。欧洲心脏手术风险评估的逻辑对数平均为11.2±13.0。通过扩大主动脉切开切口以将左和非冠状窦之间的合缝分离成二尖瓣前小叶并用适当剪裁的牛心包膜闭合所产生的缺损,从而扩大主动脉瓣环。结果:医院死亡率为2%,其中20例晚期死亡主要归因于非心脏疾病。最多随访18年(平均8.9±5.0年),精算生存率为37%±9%。没有观察到严重的患者假体错配的情况,只有2例患者出现了中度假体错配。出院时,主动脉根部的平均直径为30.0±2.3 mm,在窦管交界处的平均直径为31.5±5.0 mm。随访时,主动脉根的平均直径为31.0±3.4 mm,在鼻管交界处的平均直径为31.7±4.5 mm(P =不显着),在血管计算机断层扫描中未发现晚期动脉瘤形成。结论:扩大主动脉瓣环是一种安全有效的方法,应在主动脉瓣环较小的患者中使用。特别是应考虑防止假体错配及其潜在的有害长期影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号