...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery >Effect of mechanical assistance of the systemic ventricle in single ventricle circulation with cavopulmonary connection
【24h】

Effect of mechanical assistance of the systemic ventricle in single ventricle circulation with cavopulmonary connection

机译:腔室连接在单心室循环中对心室的机械辅助作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Previous attempts to support single ventricle circulation mechanically have suggested that a custom-built assist device is needed to push, rather than pull, through the pulmonary circulation. We hypothesized that using a conventional ventricular assist device, with or without conversion of a total cavopulmonary connection to a bidirectional Glenn cavopulmonary connection, would allow assistance by pulling blood through the circuit and improve the cardiac index (CI). Methods Cavopulmonary connections were established in each of 5 Yorkshire pigs (25 kg) using ePTFE conduits in a Y configuration with appropriate clamping of the limbs of the Y to achieve a total cavopulmonary Fontan connection (TCPC), superior vena cava cavopulmonary connection (SVC Glenn), and inferior vena cava cavopulmonary connection (IVC Glenn). A common atrium had been established previously by balloon septostomy. Mechanical circulatory assistance of the single systemic ventricle was achieved using a centrifugal pump with common atrial inflow and proximal ascending aortic outflow. The CI was calculated using an ultrasonic flow meter placed on the distal ascending aorta and compared between the assisted and nonassisted circulation for 3 conditions: TCPC, SVC Glenn, and IVC Glenn. The mean pulmonary artery pressure, common atrial pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, partial pressure of arterial oxygen, and oxygen delivery were calculated. Results The unassisted SVC Glenn CI tended to be greater than the TCPC or IVC Glenn CI. Significant augmentation of total CI was achieved with mechanical assistance for SVC Glenn (109% ± 24%, P =.04) and TCPC (130% ± 109%, P =.01). The assisted CI achieved at least a mean baseline biventricular CI for all 3 support modes. Oxygen delivery was greatest for assisted SVC Glenn (1786 ± 1307 mL/L/min) and lowest for TCPC (1146 ± 386 mL/L/min), with a trend toward lower common atrial and pulmonary artery pressures for SVC Glenn. Conclusions SVC bidirectional Glenn circulation might allow optimal augmentation of the CI and oxygen delivery in a failing single ventricle using a conventional pediatric ventricular assist device. The results from our model also suggest that the Fontan circulation itself can be supported with systemic ventricular assistance of the single ventricle.
机译:背景技术先前以机械方式支持单心室循环的尝试已经提出,需要定制的辅助装置来推动而不是拉动肺循环。我们假设使用常规的心室辅助设备,无论是否将总的腔肺连接转换为双向Glenn腔肺连接,都可以通过将血液通过回路抽出并改善心脏指数(CI)来提供帮助。方法使用Y型构型的ePTFE导管,在Y形肢体上适当夹紧,在5头约克郡猪(25 kg)中建立每只猪的肺腔连接,以实现总的腔肺Font门连接(TCPC),上腔静脉腔肺连接(SVC Glenn )和下腔静脉腔肺连接(IVC Glenn)。先前已通过球囊造口术建立了一个共同的心房。使用具有常见心房流入和近端升主动脉流出的离心泵来实现单个全身心室的机械循环辅助。使用放置在远端升主动脉上的超声波流量计计算CI,并在3种情况下的辅助循环和非辅助循环之间进行比较:TCPC,SVC Glenn和IVC Glenn。计算平均肺动脉压,普通心房压,动脉血氧饱和度,动脉血氧分压和氧气输送量。结果独立的SVC Glenn CI倾向于大于TCPC或IVC Glenn CI。机械辅助SVC Glenn(109%±24%,P = .04)和TCPC(130%±109%,P = .01)可显着提高总CI。在所有3种支持模式下,辅助CI均至少达到了平均双心室基线CI。辅助SVC Glenn的氧气输送量最大(1786±1307 mL / L / min),而TCPC则最低(1146±386 mL / L / min),SVC Glenn的心房和肺动脉压趋于降低。结论SVC双向Glenn循环可允许使用常规的儿科心室辅助设备在出现故障的单个心室中最佳地增加CI和氧气输送。我们模型的结果还表明,单心室的系统性心室辅助可以支持丰坦循环本身。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号