首页> 外文期刊>The journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute >Frazer strikes back from the armchair: a new search for the animist soul~*
【24h】

Frazer strikes back from the armchair: a new search for the animist soul~*

机译:弗雷泽(Frazer)从扶手椅上反击:寻找万物有灵的灵魂〜*

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The question which runs throughout this talk can be stated in stark form: is it a mistake to take our interest in an ethnographic phenomenon in the direction of empirical investigation when what is really needed with respect to its clarity is an imaginative contemplation of it? It is my overall argument that the Malinowskian recourse to ethnographical evidence is misguided. As an example, I take the animist conception of 'soul'. I will show how it is essentially an imaginary issue. Rendering it intelligible, therefore, involves launching a speculative investigation into the source of its origin. This finds an echo in Frazer, the last survivor of the old 'armchair school'. His style of anthropology was marked by a deliberate speculative interrogation of cross-cultural ethnography - a process whereby abstract thinking gives force and meaning to ethnographic observations.
机译:整个谈话中一直存在的问题可以用鲜明的形式表述:将我们对人种学现象的兴趣朝实证研究的方向转移是错误的,而就其清晰性而言真正需要的是对它的想象力思考吗?我的总体论点是,马林诺夫斯基人种学研究方法是错误的。例如,我以万物有灵论的“灵魂”概念。我将说明它本质上是一个虚构的问题。因此,要使其具有可理解性,就必须对其起源进行一次推测性调查。这在旧的“扶手椅学校”的最后幸存者弗雷泽(Frazer)中找到了回音。他的人类学风格以对跨文化人种学的深思熟虑的思考为特征,这一过程使抽象思维为人种学观察提供了力量和意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号