首页> 外文期刊>The journal of sexual medicine >Efficacy of Psychosocial Interventions in Men and Women with Sexual Dysfunctions-A Systematic Review of Controlled Clinical Trials: Part 1-The efficacy of psychosocial interventions for male sexual dysfunction Berner and Günzler Psychosocial Interventions in Male Sexual Dysfunction
【24h】

Efficacy of Psychosocial Interventions in Men and Women with Sexual Dysfunctions-A Systematic Review of Controlled Clinical Trials: Part 1-The efficacy of psychosocial interventions for male sexual dysfunction Berner and Günzler Psychosocial Interventions in Male Sexual Dysfunction

机译:男性和女性性功能障碍的社会心理干预效果-对照临床试验的系统评价:第1部分:男性性功能障碍的心理社会干预的有效性伯纳和古伦瑟男性性功能障碍的心理干预

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction: As yet, a summary of research evidence concerning the efficacy of psychological treatment in male sexual dysfunction is lacking. Aim: Our systematic review gives an overview of the efficacy of psychosocial interventions in all male sexual dysfunctions. Main Outcome Measures: Main outcome measures included, for example, psychometrically validated scales, interviews, and clinical assessment by an independent rater. The efficacy of psychosocial interventions was measured, for example, by the frequency of and satisfaction with sexual activity and sexual functioning. Methods: The systematic literature search included electronic database search, handsearch, contact with experts, and an ancestry approach. Studies were included if the man was given a formal diagnosis of a sexual dysfunction (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems [ICD10/-9]; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [DSM-IV/-III-R]) and when the intervention was psychosocial or psychotherapeutic. The control group included either another treatment or a waiting-list control group. The report of relevant outcomes was necessary for inclusion as well as the design of the study (randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and controlled clinical trials [CCTs]). The assessment of methodological quality comprised aspects of randomization, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and allegiance. Results: We identified 19 RCTs and one CCT that investigated the efficacy in male sexual dysfunction and two further studies that examined male and female sexual dysfunction together. Twelve out of 20 trials in men used either a concept derived from Masters and Johnson or a cognitive-behavioral treatment program. Overall, psychosocial interventions improved sexual functioning. While one study found that psychotherapy is superior to sildenafil, another study found the opposite. In men with premature ejaculation, behavioral techniques proved to be effective. A shortcoming was the rather low methodological quality of included studies. Conclusions: Most of the compared interventions proved to be similarly effective. Possibly, there are underlying constructs throughout all therapies that have an effect on the outcome. Berner M and Günzler C. Efficacy of psychosocial interventions in men and women with sexual dysfunctions-A systematic review of controlled clinical trials.
机译:简介:迄今为止,尚缺乏有关心理治疗对男性性功能障碍的疗效的研究证据的总结。目的:我们的系统评价概述了社会心理干预对所有男性性功能障碍的疗效。主要结果指标:主要结果指标包括,例如,经心理计量学验证的量表,访谈和独立评估者的临床评估。例如,通过性活动和性功能的频率以及对性活动和性功能的满意度来衡量社会心理干预的有效性。方法:系统的文献搜索包括电子数据库搜索,手工搜索,与专家联系以及祖先方法。如果该男子被正式诊断为性功能障碍,则纳入研究(《疾病和相关健康问题国际统计分类》 [ICD10 / -9];《精神疾病诊断和统计手册》 [DSM-IV / -III-R])以及干预方式为社会心理治疗或心理治疗。对照组包括另一种治疗或等候名单对照组。相关结果的报告对于纳入研究和设计是必要的(随机对照试验[RCT]和对照临床试验[CCT])。方法学质量评估包括随机化,盲法,不完整的结果数据,选择性报告和效忠方面。结果:我们确定了19项RCT和一项CCT研究了男性性功能障碍的功效,并进行了两项进一步的研究,一起研究了男性和女性性功能障碍。在20项针对男性的试验中,有12项使用了来自Masters and Johnson的概念或认知行为治疗程序。总体而言,社会心理干预改善了性功能。尽管一项研究发现心理治疗优于西地那非,但另一项研究却相反。对于早泄的男性,行为技巧被证明是有效的。缺点是纳入研究的方法学质量较低。结论:大多数比较的干预措施被证明是有效的。可能,所有疗法中都有可能影响结果的潜在结构。 Berner M和GünzlerC.对有性功能障碍的男性和女性进行社会心理干预的功效-对照临床试验的系统评价。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号