首页> 外文期刊>The journal of sexual medicine >How do continence nurses address sexual function and a history of sexual abuse in daily practice? Results of a pilot study.
【24h】

How do continence nurses address sexual function and a history of sexual abuse in daily practice? Results of a pilot study.

机译:失禁护士在日常工作中如何处理性功能和性虐待史?初步研究的结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: There is a strong association between urological complaints, sexual dysfunction, and history of sexual abuse (SA), and it is unknown whether urological continence nurses integrate this knowledge in their daily practice. AIM: To evaluate how, in their daily practice, Dutch urological continence nurses address sexual dysfunction and possible SA. METHODS: An anonymous 19-item questionnaire was distributed among all Dutch urinary continence nurses visiting their yearly congress. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The survey results. RESULTS: The response rate was 48.9% (93/190). Of the respondents, 11.8% did not ask their female patients about sexual function; 37.6% asked only rarely; 44.1% asked often; and 6.5% always asked. Sexual functioning in males was not evaluated by the majority of the nurses (13.2% never, and 46.2% rarely). A minority of continence nurses asked males about sexual functioning (36.3% often and 4.3% always). Important reasons for not asking were insufficient knowledge of how to adequately ask males (38.9%) and females (47.8%) about sexual problems, and because nurses assumed the urologist had addressed this issue (48.1% asking males, 39.1% asking females). Younger nurses found it particularly difficult to raise sexual issues with both male and female patients (P=0.001 and P=0.003, respectively). Screening for sexual dysfunction was stated to be important by almost all nurses (65.2% "quite important," and 31.5% "very important"). Within their patient population, both male and female, 28% of the nurses never asked about SA and 49.5% asked only rarely. CONCLUSION: Dutch urological incontinence nurses acknowledge the importance of sexual problems in their patient population, but asking about this issue was not part of routine care. The main reasons for not asking, according to the nurses' responses, were that they had insufficient knowledge and that they assumed the urologist had already asked about sexual problems.
机译:引言:泌尿科主诉,性功能障碍和性虐待史(SA)之间有很强的联系,并且尚不知道泌尿科小便护士是否将这种知识纳入他们的日常工作中。目的:评估荷兰泌尿外科小便护士在日常工作中如何解决性功能障碍和可能的SA。方法:向所有参加年度大会的荷兰泌尿节制护士分发了一个匿名的19项问卷。主要观察指标:调查结果。结果:回应率为48.9%(93/190)。在受访者中,没有询问女性患者性功能的比例为11.8%; 37.6%的人很少问; 44.1%的人经常问;和6.5%总是被问到。大多数护士没有评估男性的性功能(从未有过13.2%,很少有46.2%)。少数的节制护士向男性询问性功能(经常36.3%,经常4.3%)。拒绝询问的重要原因是对如何充分询问男性(38.9%)和女性(47.8%)关于性问题的知识不足,并且由于护士认为泌尿科医生已经解决了这个问题(男性询问了48.1%,女性询问了39.1%)。年轻的护士发现,男性和女性患者出现性问题特别困难(分别为P = 0.001和P = 0.003)。几乎所有护士都认为筛查性功能障碍很重要(“非常重要”为65.2%,“非常重要”为31.5%)。在男女患者中,有28%的护士从未询问过SA,只有49.5%的护士很少询问。结论:荷兰的尿失禁护士承认性问题在其患者人群中的重要性,但询问该问题并非常规护理的一部分。根据护士的回答,不询问的主要原因是他们没有足够的知识,并且假定泌尿科医生已经询问过性问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号