...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science >A comparison of the immunological effects of propofol and isoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia in healthy dogs
【24h】

A comparison of the immunological effects of propofol and isoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia in healthy dogs

机译:异丙酚和异氟烷维持健康犬麻醉的免疫学作用比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Most anesthetics have an immuno-suppressive effect on cellular and neurohumoral immunity, and research shows that total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol has a greater immuno-protective effect than inhalational anesthesia in human medicine. However, in veterinary clinics, these effects remain ambiguous. To clarify the details, we focused on propofol and isoflurane, investigating clinical blood hematology and immunological profiles drawn from healthy dogs under and after two anesthesia techniques. Twelve healthy adult beagles were included in this study, randomly assigned to the propofol anesthesia group (group P: n=6) or the isoflurane anesthesia group (group I: n=6). In both groups, the number of lymphocytes in peripheral blood decreased after 2 hr of anesthesia (2 hr), but group P showed significantly less decrease than group I. For T-lymphocyte subsets examined by flowcytometry, the ratio of CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes in the peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) of group Pat 2 hr also exhibited a high level compared to group I. Moreover, for mRNA expression of cytokines measured by real-time PCR, the IL2 (pro-inflammatory cytokine) of group P showed no decrease like group I. The IL10 (anti-inflammatory cytokine) of group P also showed no increase like group I, while both cytokines maintained nearly the same level until 2 hr. These results suggest that, compared to propofol, isoflurane had more strongly immuno-suppression caused by anesthesia, and propofol itself might have some immuno-protective effects. Thus, TIVA with propofol might benefit immunological support in the perioperative period of dogs.
机译:大多数麻醉剂对细胞和神经体液免疫具有免疫抑制作用,研究表明,在人用药物中,异丙酚全静脉麻醉(TIVA)具有比吸入麻醉更大的免疫保护作用。但是,在兽医诊所中,这些影响仍然不明确。为了阐明细节,我们重点研究了异丙酚和异氟烷,研究了在两种麻醉技术下和麻醉后从健康犬身上提取的临床血液学和免疫学特征。这项研究包括十二只健康的成年小猎犬,随机分为丙泊酚麻醉组(P组:n = 6)或异氟烷麻醉组(I组:n = 6)。两组均在麻醉2小时(2小时)后外周血淋巴细胞减少,但P组的减少明显少于I组。对于通过流式细胞术检测的T淋巴细胞亚群,CD3 +,CD4 +和CD8 +的比率与I组相比,Pat 2小时组的外周血单个核细胞(PBMC)中的淋巴细胞也表现出高水平。此外,对于通过实时PCR测量的细胞因子的mRNA表达,P组的IL2(​​促炎性细胞因子) P组的IL10(抗炎细胞因子)没有显示出与I组相同的降低。直到2小时,两种细胞因子的水平几乎保持相同。这些结果表明,与异丙酚相比,异氟烷具有更强的麻醉引起的免疫抑制作用,并且异丙酚本身可能具有一定的免疫保护作用。因此,含异丙酚的TIVA可能在犬围手术期有益于免疫学支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号