首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of school health >A randomized controlled trial of a public health nurse-delivered asthma program to elementary schools
【24h】

A randomized controlled trial of a public health nurse-delivered asthma program to elementary schools

机译:一项由公共卫生护士提供的哮喘计划在小学阶段的随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Childhood asthma is a serious and common chronic disease that requires the attention of nurses and other school personnel. Schools are often the first setting that children take the lead in managing their asthma. Often, children are ill prepared for this role. Our study evaluated a school-based, multifaceted asthma program that targeted students with asthma and the broader school community. METHODS: A randomized trial involving 130 schools with grades 1-5 and 1316 children with asthma and their families was conducted. Outcomes of interest for the child, at 1year, were urgent care use and school absenteeism for asthma, inhaler technique, and quality of life, and for the school, at 14months, were indicators of a supportive school environment. RESULTS: Improvements were observed at the child and school level for the intervention group. Fewer children in the intervention group had a school absence (50% vs 60%; p<.01), required urgent care for asthma (41% vs 51%; p<.0001), or reported a day of interrupted activity (51% vs 63%; p<.01), and had improved quality of life (5.8±1.2 vs 5.4±1.4; p<.0001). Schools in the intervention group were more likely to have practices supporting an asthma-friendly environment. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a multifaceted school-based asthma program can lead to asthma-friendly schools that support children with asthma to be successful managers of their asthma and experience improved quality of life and decreased disease associated burden.
机译:背景:儿童哮喘是一种严重且常见的慢性疾病,需要护士和其他学校人员的注意。学校通常是儿童带头控制哮喘的首要环境。通常,儿童对此角色准备不足。我们的研究评估了针对哮喘患者和更广泛的学校社区的基于学校的多方面哮喘计划。方法:进行了一项随机试验,涉及130所1-5年级学校和1316例哮喘儿童及其家庭。对儿童而言,在1岁时感兴趣的结果是紧急护理和因哮喘,吸入器技术和生活质量而缺勤的学校,而对于14个月的学校来说,这是支持学校环境的指标。结果:干预组的儿童和学校水平有所改善。干预组中较少的孩子没有上学(50%vs 60%; p <.01),需要紧急治疗哮喘(41%vs 51%; p <.0001),或报告有一天活动中断(51) %vs. 63%; p <.01),并且生活质量得到改善(5.8±1.2 vs 5.4±1.4; p <.0001)。干预组的学校更有可能采取支持哮喘友好环境的做法。结论:实施以学校为基础的多方面哮喘计划可导致对哮喘友好的学校,该学校支持哮喘儿童成为成功的哮喘管理者,并改善生活质量并减轻疾病相关负担。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号