首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper tract transitional cell cancer: the Washington University experience.
【24h】

Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper tract transitional cell cancer: the Washington University experience.

机译:腹腔镜肾结直肠癌切除术治疗上段移行细胞癌:华盛顿大学的经验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: The recognized form of therapy for patients with ureteral or renal pelvis transitional cell carcinoma is total nephroureterectomy with excision of the ipsilateral periureteral cuff of bladder mucosa. We report our experience with 10 patients who underwent laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper tract transitional cell carcinoma through July 1994 and compare them to a contemporary group of patients undergoing open nephroureterectomy for the same disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 10 patients undergoing laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper tract transitional cell carcinoma was evaluated with respect to operative time, surgical specimen weight, pathological stage, postoperative analgesia requirement, interval to resume normal oral intake, postoperative recovery and results of postoperative surveillance. Of the patients 8 who underwent open surgical nephroureterectomy during a contemporary period for the same diagnosis were evaluated for the same parameters and compared to the laparoscopic group. RESULTS: Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy averaged twice as long as open nephroureterectomy. However, the laparoscopic patients resumed oral intake sooner, required less postoperative analgesia and had a shorter hospital stay compared to the open surgical group. The laparoscopic nephroureterectomy patients returned to normal activities within less than half the time (2.8 versus 6 weeks) and completely recovered 5 times more rapidly (6 weeks versus 7.4 months). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy is a feasible treatment option for patients with upper tract transitional cell carcinoma. However, 2 major drawbacks to the approach persist, that is the lengthy operative time and the need for significant laparoscopic experience on the part of the surgeon.
机译:目的:输尿管或肾盂骨盆移行细胞癌的公认治疗方法是全肾切除术,切除膀胱粘膜的同侧输尿管套。我们报告了我们的经验,直到1994年7月,他们都接受了10例接受腹腔镜肾结直肠癌切除术治疗上段移行细胞癌的经验,并将他们与同期接受相同疾病开放性肾结石切除术的一组患者进行了比较。材料与方法:对10例行上腹移行细胞癌的腹腔镜肾结直肠癌切除术的患者进行了手术时间,手术标本重量,病理分期,术后镇痛要求,恢复正常口腔摄取的间隔,术后恢复以及术后结果的评估。监视。在同一时期,对8例因同一诊断而接受开腹手术的患者进行了相同参数的评估,并与腹腔镜组进行了比较。结果:腹腔镜肾切除术的平均时间是开放性肾切除术的两倍。但是,与开放式手术组相比,腹腔镜手术患者可以更快地恢复口腔摄取,需要更少的术后镇痛作用并且住院时间更短。腹腔镜肾结直肠癌切除术患者在不到一半的时间(2.8对6周)内恢复了正常活动,并且完全康复了5倍(6周对7.4个月)。结论:腹腔镜肾结直肠癌切除术是上路移行细胞癌患者的可行治疗选择。然而,该方法的两个主要缺点仍然存在,即手术时间长和外科医生需要大量的腹腔镜经验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号