首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Adult anterior urethral strictures: a national practice patterns survey of board certified urologists in the United States.
【24h】

Adult anterior urethral strictures: a national practice patterns survey of board certified urologists in the United States.

机译:成人前尿道狭窄:美国董事会认证的泌尿科医生的国家实践模式调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: We determined the methods and patterns of the evaluation of and treatment for adult anterior urethral stricture disease by practicing urologists in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A nationwide survey of practicing members of the American Urological Association was performed by a mailed questionnaire. A total of 1,262 urologists were randomly selected from all 50 states, of whom 431 (34%) completed the questionnaire. RESULTS: Most urologists (63%) treat 6 to 20 urethral strictures yearly. The most common procedures used by those surveyed for urethral strictures were dilation (92.8%), optical internal urethrotomy (85.6%) and endourethral stent (23.4%). Minimally invasive procedures are used more frequently that any open urethroplasty technique. Furthermore, most urologists (57.8%) do not perform urethroplasty surgery. When used, the most common urethroplasty surgeries performed were end-to-end anastomotic urethroplasty, perineal urethrostomy and ventral skin graft urethroplasty. Few urologists (4.2%) performed buccal mucosa grafts. For a long bulbar urethral stricture or short bulbar urethral stricture refractory to internal urethrotomy 20% to 29% of respondents would refer to another urologist, while 31% to 33% would continue to manage the stricture by minimally invasive means despite predictable failure. Of the urologists 74% believed that the literature supports a reconstructive surgical ladder, in which urethroplasty is only performed after repeat failure of endoscopic methods. CONCLUSIONS: Most urologists in the United States have little experience with urethroplasty surgery. Most urologists erroneously believe that the literature supports a reconstructive surgical ladder for urethral stricture management. Unfamiliarity with the literature and inexperience with urethroplasty surgery have made the use of endoscopic methods inappropriately common.
机译:目的:我们确定了由美国的泌尿科医师对成人前尿道狭窄疾病进行评估和治疗的方法和模式。材料与方法:通过邮寄问卷对美国泌尿科协会从业人员进行了一项全国性调查。从所有50个州中随机抽取了1,262名泌尿科医师,其中431名(34%)完成了调查问卷。结果:大多数泌尿科医师(63%)每年治疗6至20例尿道狭窄。被调查者最常使用的尿道狭窄手术是扩张术(92.8%),光学内尿道切开术(85.6%)和尿道内支架(23.4%)。与任何开放式尿道成形术相比,微创手术的使用频率更高。此外,大多数泌尿科医生(57.8%)不进行尿道成形术。使用时,最常见的尿道置换术是端到端吻合口尿道置换术,会阴尿道造口术和腹侧皮肤移植尿道置换术。泌尿科医生很少(4.2%)进行颊粘膜移植。对于内尿道切开术难治的长延髓性尿道狭窄或短延性尿道性尿道狭窄,有20%至29%的受访者会转介另一位泌尿外科医师,而31%至33%的人将继续通过微创手段继续治疗狭窄,尽管可预见的失败。 74%的泌尿科医生认为,文献支持重建性手术阶梯,其中仅在内镜方法反复失败后才进行尿道成形术。结论:在美国大多数泌尿科医师很少有尿道成形术的经验。大多数泌尿科医生错误地认为,文献支持用于尿道狭窄管理的重建性手术阶梯。对文献的不熟悉和对尿道成形术的经验不足使内窥镜检查方法不适当地普遍使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号