首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Ureteroscopic removal of mildly migrated stents using local anesthesia only.
【24h】

Ureteroscopic removal of mildly migrated stents using local anesthesia only.

机译:仅使用局部麻醉在输尿管镜下去除轻度迁移的支架。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: In the outpatient office setting we evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of ureteroscopic removal of upward migrated ureteral stents using local or no anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospectively 37 patients with mild upward stent migration underwent ureteroscopic stent removal under local or no anesthesia. Stent migration was always below the pelvic brim. It was diagnosed by plain x-ray of the kidneys, ureters and bladder, and flexible cystoscopy. Semirigid ureteroscopy was performed in the office outpatient setting. After each procedure patients graded the discomfort and/or pain level experienced by completing 2 separate 5-scale visual analog pain scores, including 1 for flexible cystoscopy and 1 for the ureteroscopic procedure. Pain scores were compared between the 2 procedures. RESULTS: Stent removal was successful in 34 of 37 patients (91.9%). Successful procedures were never interrupted due to pain intolerance. No complications occurred. The mean visual analog pain score for ureteroscopic stent removal was 1.73 and it was similar in men and women (p = 0.199). The mean visual analog pain score for flexible cystoscopy was 1.27. This procedure was significantly more painful in men than in women (p = 0.018). Ureteroscopic stent removal was more painful than flexible cystoscopy overall and in women (each p <0.01) but not in men (p = 0.3). All patients were discharged home within 1 hour after the procedure and no patient required hospital admission or a new hospital visit. CONCLUSIONS: Ureteroscopic removal of a migrated stent using local anesthesia is effective, safe and tolerable in select patients. Preventing the complications and costs associated with general or spinal anesthesia makes this option appealing to patients and it should be offered when possible.
机译:目的:在门诊办公室环境中,我们评估了使用局部麻醉或不使用麻醉方法输尿管镜移除向上迁移的输尿管支架的可行性和有效性。材料与方法:大约37例轻度向上支架移位的患者在局麻或未麻醉的情况下接受了输尿管镜支架摘除术。支架迁移始终低于骨盆边缘。它是通过肾脏,输尿管和膀胱的X线平片以及柔性膀胱镜检查诊断的。半硬性输尿管镜检查是在办公室门诊进行的。每次手术后,患者通过完成2个单独的5级视觉模拟疼痛评分来对不适和/或疼痛程度进行分级,其中1分用于软性膀胱镜检查,而1分用于输尿管镜手术。比较这两种方法的疼痛评分。结果:37例患者中有34例(91.9%)成功去除了支架。成功的手术从未因不耐受而中断。没有并发症发生。输尿管镜支架摘除术的平均视觉模拟疼痛评分为1.73,男女相似(p = 0.199)。柔性膀胱镜检查的平均视觉模拟疼痛评分为1.27。男性患者比女性患者更痛苦(p = 0.018)。总体而言,女性膀胱镜检查比软性膀胱镜检查更痛苦(每个p <0.01),而男性则没有(p = 0.3)。所有患者在手术后1小时内出院,没有患者需要住院或再次就诊。结论:局部麻醉在输尿管镜下清除迁移的支架对于某些患者是有效,安全且可耐受的。预防与全身麻醉或脊柱麻醉相关的并发症和费用,使该选项吸引了患者,因此应尽可能提供。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号