首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Verapamil versus saline in electromotive drug administration for Peyronie's disease: a double-blind, placebo controlled trial.
【24h】

Verapamil versus saline in electromotive drug administration for Peyronie's disease: a double-blind, placebo controlled trial.

机译:维拉帕米与盐水在电动药物管理中对Peyronie病的作用:一项双盲,安慰剂对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: While surgery remains the gold standard of therapy to correct the acquired curvature of Peyronie's disease, the search for a less invasive therapy continues. Transdermal drug delivery was proposed to be superior to oral or injection therapy because it bypasses hepatic metabolism and minimizes the pain of injection. After electromotive drug administration with verapamil tunica albuginea specimens were demonstrated to contain detectable levels of the drug. Due to varying success with verapamil as injectable therapy for Peyronie's disease we performed a double-blind, placebo controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of verapamil delivered through electromotive drug administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 42 men with Peyronie's disease volunteered to participate in this study, which was approved by our institutional review board. A genitourinary examination was performed on all patients, including plaque location, stretched penile length, objective measurement of curvature after papaverine injection and duplex ultrasound. Each subject was randomized to receive 10 mg verapamil in 4 cc saline or 4 cc saline via electromotive drug administration. A Mini-Physionizer (Physion, Mirandola, Italy) device was used at a power of 2.4 mA for 20 minutes. Treatments were performed 2 times weekly for 3 months. After 3 months each patient was reevaluated with physical examination and duplex ultrasound by a technician blinded to the treatment received. A modified erectile dysfunction index of treatment satisfaction questionnaire was also completed by each patient. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients were randomized to the verapamil treatment group (group 1) and 19 were randomized to the saline group (group 2). There were no significant differences between patient groups with respect to patient age, disease duration or pretreatment curvature. In group 1, 15 patients (65%) had measured improvement (mean 9.1 degrees, range 5 to 30), 5 (22%) had no change and in 3 (13%) the condition worsened. In group 2, 11patients (58%) had measured improvement (mean 7.6 degrees, range 5 to 30), 7 (37%) showed no change and in 1 (5%) the condition worsened. To better evaluate effectiveness the total number of patients experiencing significant improvement (20 degrees or greater) was calculated and compared. Seven patients (30%) in group 1 and 4 (21%) in group 2 achieved this criterion. Although a greater percent of patients treated with verapamil had improved curvature, the results were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Although a greater percent of patients treated with verapamil in our electromotive drug administration protocol had a measured decrease in curvature, the results were not statistically significant. Further research is necessary to determine whether electric current may have a role in the treatment of Peyronie's disease as well as if verapamil delivered via electromotive drug administration may have a role as effective treatment. Electromotive drug administration is a treatment option in the patient whose major complaint is pain or in the patient with mild curvature who does not wish to undergo intralesional therapy or surgical correction.
机译:目的:尽管手术仍然是纠正获得性佩罗尼氏病弯曲的黄金疗法标准,但继续寻求更具创伤性的疗法。有人提出,经皮给药优于口服或注射疗法,因为它绕过了肝脏的新陈代谢并使注射的痛苦最小化。用维拉帕米衣电动车给药后,白蛋白样本被证明含有可检测水平的药物。由于维拉帕米作为佩罗尼氏病的可注射疗法取得了不同的成功,因此我们进行了一项双盲,安慰剂对照试验,以确定通过电动药物给药传递的维拉帕米的有效性。材料与方法:共有42名Peyronie's病患者自愿参加了这项研究,该研究得到了我们机构审查委员会的批准。对所有患者进行泌尿生殖系统检查,包括斑块位置,阴茎伸展长度,注射罂粟碱后的曲率客观测量和双工超声检查。通过电动药物施用,将每个受试者随机接受在4cc盐水或4cc盐水中的10mg维拉帕米。使用Mini-Physionizer(意大利米兰达拉市的Physion)设备以2.4 mA的功率供电20分钟。每周进行2次治疗,共3个月。 3个月后,由不愿接受治疗的技术人员对每位患者进行了体格检查和双工超声检查,以进行重新评估。每个患者还完成了改良的勃起功能障碍指数治疗满意度问卷。结果:总共23例患者被随机分配到维拉帕米治疗组(第1组),而19例被随机分配到盐水组(第2组)。在患者年龄,疾病持续时间或治疗前弯曲度方面,患者组之间无显着差异。在第1组中,有15例(65%)的患者病情好转(平均9.1度,范围5至30),其中5例(22%)病情无变化,而3例(13%)病情恶化。在第2组中,有11名患者(58%)的病情好转(平均7.6度,范围5至30),其中7名(37%)的病情无变化,在1名(5%)的病情恶化。为了更好地评估有效性,计算并比较了经历显着改善(20度或更高)的患者总数。第一组的七名患者(30%)和第二组的第四名(21%)达到了这一标准。尽管接受维拉帕米治疗的患者中有较大百分比的曲率有所改善,但结果在统计学上并不显着。结论:尽管在我们的电动药物给药方案中,接受维拉帕米治疗的患者中有较大比例的曲率明显降低,但结果无统计学意义。有必要进行进一步的研究以确定电流是否可能在治疗Peyronie病中起作用,以及通过电动药物给药传递的维拉帕米是否可能在有效治疗中起作用。在主要症状是疼痛的患者或不希望接受病灶内治疗或手术矫正的轻度弯曲患者中,电动药物管理是一种治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号