首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Renal arterial injuries: a single center analysis of management strategies and outcomes.
【24h】

Renal arterial injuries: a single center analysis of management strategies and outcomes.

机译:肾动脉损伤:管理策略和结果的单中心分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: Management of main and segmental renal artery injury following external trauma is controversial. After main renal artery injury the controversy surrounds nephrectomy vs revascularization, whereas after segmental renal artery injury the debate involves operative vs nonoperative management. We reviewed our experience with renal artery injury management at a single trauma center with the goal of identifying optimal clinical management strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on a total of 82 renal artery injuries in 81 patients collected between 1978 and 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, length of stay, transfusion requirements and injury characteristics (artery subtype, grade, mechanism, and associated parenchymal, venous and nonrenal injuries) were recorded. Management strategies and outcomes for each renal artery injury subtype were compared. RESULTS: Median patient age was 28 years (range 4 to 74) and 90% of the patients were male. Main renal artery injury occurred in 36 of 81 patients (43%) and segmental renal artery injury occurred in 45 (57%). Injury characteristics were similar for each renal artery injury subtype. For main renal artery injury the respective outcomes of nephrectomy vs vascular repair were a mean transfusion of 10,275 vs 6,125 ml (p = 0.39), length of stay 18 days for each, mortality rate 26% vs 13%, renal failure rate 8% vs 25% and renal insufficiency/impaired selective function by renal scintigraphy 4% vs 13% (each p not significant). For segmental renal artery injury operative vs nonoperative management was associated with a mean transfusion of 4,994 vs 820 ml (p = 0.01), length of stay 29 vs 11 days (p = 0.23) and mortality rate 8% vs 6% (p = 1.0). Renal failure and impaired selective renal function on scintigraphy were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Nephrectomy for main renal artery injury has outcomes similar to those of vascular repair and it does not worsen posttreatment renal function in the short term. Nonoperative management for segmental renal artery injury results in excellent outcomes.
机译:目的:外部创伤后主要和部分肾动脉损伤的治疗存在争议。在主要肾动脉损伤后,争议在于肾切除术与血运重建,而在部分肾动脉损伤后,辩论涉及手术与非手术管理。我们在单个创伤中心回顾了我们在肾动脉损伤管理方面的经验,旨在确定最佳的临床管理策略。材料与方法:回顾性分析了1978年至2006年间收集的81例患者的82例肾动脉损伤数据。记录患者的人口统计资料,住院时间,输血要求和损伤特征(动脉亚型,等级,机制以及相关的实质,静脉和非肾脏损伤)。比较每种肾动脉损伤亚型的治疗策略和结果。结果:患者中位年龄为28岁(4至74岁),其中90%为男性。 81例患者中有36例发生了主要肾动脉损伤(43%),而45例(57%)发生了部分肾动脉损伤。每种肾动脉损伤亚型的损伤特征相似。对于主要的肾动脉损伤,肾切除术与血管修复术的平均结局分别为:平均输血10,275 vs 6,125 ml(p = 0.39),每次住院时间为18天,死亡率分别为26%vs 13%,肾衰竭率8%vs肾闪烁显像术的肾功能不全/选择性功能受损的比例为25%,而肾功能不全/受损的功能分别为4%和13%(均无统计学意义)。对于部分肾动脉损伤,手术组与非手术组的平均输注量分别为4,994 vs 820 ml(p = 0.01),住院时间29 vs 11天(p = 0.23)和死亡率8%vs 6%(p = 1.0) )。两组之间的肾衰竭和闪烁显像的选择性肾功能受损相似。结论:肾切除术治疗主要的肾动脉损伤具有与血管修复相似的结果,并且短期内不会恶化治疗后的肾功能。肾节段性损伤的非手术治疗可带来极好的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号