首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Responsiveness and minimum important differences for the erection quality scale.
【24h】

Responsiveness and minimum important differences for the erection quality scale.

机译:安装质量量表的响应能力和最小重要差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: We evaluated the responsiveness and treatment sensitivity of the Erection Quality Scale, and provided further psychometric validation of this scale. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An 8-week, placebo controlled, randomized clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of vardenafil in patients with erectile dysfunction was performed. The Erection Quality Scale, together with a number of other patient and partner questionnaires, was administered at a screening visit, at baseline, and weeks 4 and 8 of treatment. Erection Quality Scale responsiveness was investigated by evaluating treatment induced changes and modeling using ANCOVA. Internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity, and minimum important difference of the Erection Quality Scale were also assessed. RESULTS: Efficacy evaluations demonstrated that the Erection Quality Scale was sufficiently responsive to differentiate the treatment benefits of vardenafil compared with placebo. Internal consistency for the Erection Quality Scale total score was similar across visits, with values high enough to suggest reliability of items included in the scale. Discriminant validity of the Erection Quality Scale total score was demonstrated, with a high correlation with the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (0.88, p <0.0001) and negligible correlations with clinical measures assumed to be unrelated to erection quality. All Erection Quality Scale total score comparisons substantially exceeded the 5-point minimum important difference estimate. CONCLUSIONS: The Erection Quality Scale was responsive and internally consistent, and demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity. Furthermore, this instrument provided a unique contribution to the measurement of erection quality compared to the International Index of Erectile Function. This study provides strong evidence supporting the use of the Erection Quality Scale in clinical trials.
机译:目的:我们评估了勃起质量量表的反应性和治疗敏感性,并对该量表进行了进一步的心理计量学验证。材料与方法:进行了一项为期8周的安慰剂对照随机临床试验,研究了伐地那非对勃起功能障碍患者的疗效和安全性。在筛查,基线,治疗的第4周和第8周进行勃起质量量表以及其他许多患者和伴侣的问卷调查。通过评估治疗引起的变化并使用ANCOVA进行建模,研究了安装质量量表的响应能力。还评估了内部一致性,收敛性和判别性以及勃起质量量表的最小重要差异。结果:功效评估表明,与安慰剂相比,勃起质量量表能够有效区分vardenafil的治疗益处。勃起质量量表总分的内部一致性在各次访问中相似,其值足够高,表明该量表中项目的可靠性。证明了勃起质量量表总分的判别效度,与国际勃起功能指数的勃起功能域高度相关(0.88,p <0.0001),与与勃起质量无关的临床指标的相关性可忽略不计。所有勃起质量量表的总分比较都大大超过了5分的最小重要差异估计值。结论:勃起质量量表反应灵敏且内部一致,并显示出收敛性和区分性。此外,与国际勃起功能指数相比,该仪器为勃起质量的测量提供了独特的贡献。这项研究提供了有力的证据支持在临床试验中使用勃起质量量表。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号