首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >A clinical outcomes and cost analysis comparing photoselective vaporization of the prostate to alternative minimally invasive therapies and transurethral prostate resection for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
【24h】

A clinical outcomes and cost analysis comparing photoselective vaporization of the prostate to alternative minimally invasive therapies and transurethral prostate resection for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

机译:临床结果和成本分析,比较了前列腺的光选择性汽化与替代性微创疗法和经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生的情况。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: We critically evaluated the clinical outcomes and cost characteristics of alternative procedural treatment options for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An outcomes and cost analysis was performed for benign prostatic hyperplasia treatments, including photoselective vaporization, microwave thermotherapy, transurethral needle ablation, interstitial laser coagulation and transurethral resection. Clinical outcomes were measured by the percent improvement in American Urological Association/International Prostate Symptom Score, the maximum uroflowmetry rate and quality of life score. An economic simulation model was constructed to estimate the expected cost of benign prostatic hyperplasia procedural therapies from a payer perspective. The model included costs of initial treatment, followup care, adverse events and re-treatment. Sensitivity and threshold analyses tested the impact of changing model inputs on base case results. RESULTS: Ablative therapies showed better improvement in symptom score, flow rate and quality of life score compared to thermotherapy procedures. Photoselective vaporization resulted in the largest beneficial changes in American Urological Association/International Prostate Symptom Score, the maximum uroflowmetry rate and the quality of life score at all time points evaluated, followed by transurethral resection and then interstitial laser coagulation. The estimated cost was lower for photoselective vaporization than for any other procedural option at any interval studied. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the results of baseline analyses were robust to reasonable changes in clinical and economic inputs to the model. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to alternative treatment options photoselective vaporization of the prostate is a clinically efficacious and cost-effective treatment for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia.
机译:目的:我们严格评估了对症良性前列腺增生的替代性治疗方法的临床结果和成本特征。材料与方法:对良性前列腺增生治疗进行了结果和成本分析,包括光选择性汽化,微波热疗,经尿道针头消融,间质性激光凝固和经尿道切除术。通过美国泌尿科协会/国际前列腺症状评分的改善百分比,最大尿流率和生活质量评分来衡量临床结局。建立了一个经济模拟模型,以从付款人的角度估算良性前列腺增生手术治疗的预期费用。该模型包括初始治疗,后续护理,不良事件和再治疗的费用。敏感性和阈值分析测试了更改模型输入对基本案例结果的影响。结果:与热疗法相比,消融疗法在症状评分,流速和生活质量评分方面有更好的改善。在所有评估的时间点,光选择性汽化在美国泌尿科协会/国际前列腺症状评分,最大尿流率和生活质量评分方面带来了最大的有益变化,随后进行了经尿道切除,然后进行了间质性激光凝结。在任何研究的间隔内,光选择性汽化的估计成本均低于任何其他程序性选择。敏感性分析表明,基线分析的结果对模型的临床和经济投入的合理变化具有鲁棒性。结论:与替代治疗相比,光选择性前列腺汽化术是对症性前列腺增生的一种临床有效且具有成本效益的治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号