首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >The cost-effectiveness of endoscopic injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer for vesicoureteral reflux.
【24h】

The cost-effectiveness of endoscopic injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer for vesicoureteral reflux.

机译:内镜下注射右旋糖酐/透明质酸共聚物用于膀胱输尿管返流的成本效益。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: Vesicoureteral reflux is a risk factor for progressive renal damage associated with urinary tract infection. Mild to moderate reflux is routinely treated with long-term antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent recurrent infections and open surgical reimplantation for breakthrough infections despite antibiotic therapy. Endoscopic subureteral injection of implant material is a therapeutic alternative to long-term prophylaxis and open surgery but its widespread use in the United States has been prevented by the lack of a stable implant material. Dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer has been shown to be a safe, effective and durable implant material and was recently approved in the United States. We estimate the effect on costs and cure rates of introducing endoscopic injection with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer as a treatment alternative in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We constructed a model that mimics current clinical practice of vesicoureteral reflux treatment for 6 years, and incorporates spontaneous resolution and surgical intervention rates obtained from 2 long-term followup studies. The treatment algorithm was established using medical data from the literature, and clinical management practices from a Delphi survey of 27 pediatric urologists and nephrologists across the United States. Endoscopic injection was introduced into the model as replacement to surgery or alternative to long-term antibiotic prophylaxis. The effectiveness of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer was calculated from 140 patients (208 ureters) with grade III reflux treated in a clinical study of 221 children in Sweden. RESULTS: With current practice, the average cost per patient in 6 years was 6,640 US dollars and 23.5% of patients continued to have reflux. Replacing open surgery with endoscopic injection led to similar cure rates (22.2% failures) but costs were reduced to 5,522 US dollars. When injection was performed after 1 year of antibiotic therapy failure rates were reduced to 8.5% but costs increased to 7,644 US dollars. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that a persistent approach to endoscopic surgery can be expected to result in overall success that equals or exceeds open surgery at a lower cost. This finding is particularly true if open reimplant is reserved for patients with high grade or persistent vesicoureteral reflux.
机译:目的:膀胱输尿管反流是与尿路感染相关的进行性肾脏损害的危险因素。对于轻度至中度的反流,常规进行长期抗生素预防,可预防复发性感染,即使进行抗生素治疗,也可进行外科手术再植入以突破性感染。内窥镜输尿管下植入物的植入是长期预防和开放手术的一种治疗选择,但由于缺乏稳定的植入物而无法在美国广泛使用。右旋糖酐/透明质酸共聚物已被证明是一种安全,有效和耐用的植入材料,最近在美国获得批准。我们估计在美国引入内镜注射右旋糖酐/透明质酸共聚物作为治疗替代方案对成本和治愈率的影响。材料与方法:我们构建了一个模型,该模型模仿了6年的膀胱输尿管反流治疗的当前临床实践,并结合了从2个长期随访研究中获得的自发分辨率和手术干预率。使用文献中的医学数据和Delphi对美国27位儿科泌尿科医师和肾脏科医师进行的调查的临床管理实践,建立了治疗算法。内窥镜注射被引入该模型中,以替代手术或长期预防抗生素。在瑞典的221名儿童的临床研究中,从140例III级返流患者(208例输尿管)中计算了右旋糖酐/透明质酸共聚物的有效性。结果:按照目前的做法,每位患者在6年内的平均费用为6,640美元,其中23.5%的患者继续出现反流。用内窥镜注射代替开放手术的治愈率相似(失败率达22.2%),但成本降低至5,522美元。抗生素治疗1年后进行注射时,失败率降低至8.5%,但费用增加至7,644美元。结论:我们的结果表明,持续的内窥镜手术方法有望以较低的成本获得等同于或超过开放手术的总体成功率。如果开放再植保留用于高级别或持续性膀胱输尿管反流的患者,这一发现尤其正确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号