...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of trauma and acute care surgery >An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter investigation evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of Mepilex Ag versus silver sulfadiazine in the treatment of deep partial-thickness burn injuries
【24h】

An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter investigation evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of Mepilex Ag versus silver sulfadiazine in the treatment of deep partial-thickness burn injuries

机译:一项开放,平行,随机,比较性,多中心研究,评估了Mepilex Ag与磺胺嘧啶银在治疗深部部分厚度烧伤中的功效和耐受性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Partial-thickness burns are among the most frequently encountered types of burns, and numerous dressing materials are available for their treatment. A multicenter, open, randomized, and parallel study was undertaken to determine the efficacy and tolerability of silver sulfadiazine (SSD) compared with an absorbent foam silver dressing, Mepilex Ag, on patients aged between 5 years and 65 years with deep partial-thickness thermal burn injuries (2.5-25% total body surface area).
机译:背景:部分厚度的烧伤是最常见的烧伤类型,并且有许多敷料可用于治疗。进行了一项多中心,开放,随机和平行研究,以测定磺胺嘧啶银(SSD)与吸收性泡沫银敷料Mepilex Ag相比,对5岁至65岁深部部分厚度热病患者的疗效和耐受性烫伤(身体总表面积的2.5-25%)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号