...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry >The effects of desensitizing resin, resin sealing, and provisional cement on the bond strength of dentin luted with self-adhesive and conventional resincements
【24h】

The effects of desensitizing resin, resin sealing, and provisional cement on the bond strength of dentin luted with self-adhesive and conventional resincements

机译:脱敏树脂,树脂密封剂和临时胶粘剂对用自粘和常规树脂水泥粘结的牙本质粘合强度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Statement of problem: Self-adhesive resin cements were designed to bond without any pretreatment of dentin. However, pretreatments such as the application of desensitizing resin or the resin sealing of dentin with priming/bonding solutions might influence the bonding quality of these self-adhesive resin cements. Little is known about the effect of dentin pretreatment on the bond quality of self-adhesive resin cements. Purpose: This study evaluated whether dentin desensitizing or sealing methods influenced the shear bond strength of 1 self-adhesive and 2 conventional resin cements. Material and methods: One-hundred and eighty human molars were assigned to 5 different pretreatment groups: 1) freshly ground dentin, 2) glutaraldehyde/ hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA) desensitized dentin (Gluma), 3) contamination of desensitized dentin with provisional cement, 4) sealed dentin (dual bonding technique), and 5) contamination of sealed dentin with provisional cement. The shear bond strength of a self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX Unicem; RXU) and 2 conventional resin cements (Variolink II; VAR, Panavia 21; PAN) was assessed for each pretreatment group (n=12 per cement types). Two-way ANOVA and 1-way ANOVA together with the post hoc Tukey multiple comparison (α=.05) were performed. Results: On freshly ground dentin, PAN exhibited the highest shear bond strength values (P<.001). The use of the glutaraldehyde/HEMA resulted in a significant increase in the bond strength of RXU as compared to fresh dentin (P<.001). Resin sealing of dentin increased the bond strength of RXU but had no significant effect on VAR or PAN. RXU exhibited the highest mean bond strength after the contamination of resin-sealed dentin by provisional cement. Conclusions: Glutaraldehyde/HEMA treatment and resin sealing of dentin have a beneficial effect on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement (RXU). Contamination of dentin with provisional cement has no influence on the bond strength of the self-adhesive resin cement (RXU) or VAR but lowered the bond strength of PAN. (J Prosthet Dent 2012;107:252-260)
机译:问题陈述:自粘树脂胶粘剂设计用于粘结,无需任何牙本质预处理。但是,诸如脱敏树脂的应用或使用底漆/粘合剂溶液密封牙本质的树脂之类的预处理可能会影响这些自粘树脂胶粘剂的粘合质量。关于牙本质预处理对自粘树脂胶粘剂粘结质量的影响知之甚少。目的:本研究评估了牙本质脱敏或密封方法是否会影响1种自粘和2种常规树脂水泥的剪切粘结强度。材料和方法:一百八十个人类臼齿被分为5个不同的预处理组:1)新鲜磨碎的牙本质,2)戊二醛/甲基丙烯酸羟乙酯(HEMA)脱敏牙本质(Gluma),3)脱敏牙本质被临时水泥污染,4 )密封的牙本质(双重粘合技术),以及5)临时性水泥对密封的牙本质的污染。对于每个预处理组,评估了自粘树脂水泥(RelyX Unicem; RXU)和2种常规树脂水泥(Variolink II; VAR,Panavia 21; PAN)的剪切粘结强度(每种水泥类型n = 12)。进行了两向ANOVA和一向ANOVA以及事后Tukey多重比较(α= .05)。结果:在刚研磨的牙本质上,PAN表现出最高的剪切粘结强度值(P <.001)。与新鲜牙本质相比,戊二醛/ HEMA的使用导致RXU的结合强度显着提高(P <.001)。牙本质的树脂密封增加了RXU的粘合强度,但对VAR或PAN无明显影响。在临时胶粘剂污染树脂密封的牙本质后,RXU表现出最高的平均粘结强度。结论:戊二醛/ HEMA处理和牙本质树脂密封对自粘树脂水泥(RXU)的剪切粘结强度具有有益的影响。牙本质被临时胶粘剂污染不会影响自粘树脂胶粘剂(RXU)或VAR的粘结强度,但会降低PAN的粘结强度。 (J义齿洞穴2012; 107:252-260)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号