...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry >Effect of temperature on unpolymerized composite resin film thickness.
【24h】

Effect of temperature on unpolymerized composite resin film thickness.

机译:温度对未聚合复合树脂膜厚度的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Room temperature (RT) composite resins are viscous, and this condition may affect the ability of the material to flow and adapt to preparation walls. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the film thickness of a variety of commercial composite resins heated prior to light polymerization. The film thickness of these heated materials was also compared to those of flowable products at RT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five flowable and 7 conventional composite resins were used: 2 microfills, a nanofill hybrid, 2 submicron hybrids, a trimodal hybrid, and a packable. Composite resin (0.05 mL) was pressed between 2 Mylar-covered glass plates (15 kg) for 180 seconds, light polymerized, and the thickness measured using a micrometer. When comparing conventional composite resin heated to 54 degrees C or 60 degrees C, the RT value was control, while the RT flowable values were control when compared to heated composite resin. (n=5/group). Data were analyzed using 1- and 2-way analysis of variance and the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test (alpha=.05). Correlation of filler content to flow potential was evaluated. Scanning electron microscopic analysis of polymerized specimens was characterized by filler size and shape. RESULTS: Room temperature conventional composite resin values varied in film thickness. Not all preheated products reduced in thickness. Thickness of the nanofill did not reduce, and one of the submicron hybrids reduced the greatest. No correlation existed between composite resin classification, filler content or shape, and film thickness. No difference in thickness existed between composite resins preheated to 54 degrees C and 60 degrees C. Room temperature and preheated conventional composite resin provided film thickness greater than that of flowable materials. CONCLUSIONS: Preheating conventional composite resin yields lower film thickness for some products, but flow cannot be attributed to composite resin classification, filler content, or shape. Preheated composite resin thickness was greater than that of all flowables.
机译:问题陈述:室温(RT)复合树脂是粘性的,这种情况可能会影响材料的流动能力和适应制备壁的能力。目的:本研究的目的是比较光聚合之前加热的各种商用复合树脂的膜厚。还将这些加热材料的膜厚与室温下的可流动产品的膜厚进行了比较。材料与方法:使用了5种可流动的和7种常规的复合树脂:2种微填充物,1种纳米填充杂物,2种亚微米杂物,3峰杂物和可包装树脂。将复合树脂(0.05 mL)压在2个聚脂薄膜覆盖的玻璃板(15 kg)之间180秒,进行光聚合,并使用测微计测量厚度。当比较加热至54℃或60℃的常规复合树脂时,RT值是受控的,而与可加热的复合树脂相比,RT可流动值是受控的。 (n = 5 /组)。使用1方和2方差分析和Tukey-Kramer事后检验(alpha = .05)对数据进行分析。评估了填料含量与流动电位的相关性。聚合试样的扫描电子显微镜分析以填料的大小和形状为特征。结果:室温下常规复合树脂的膜厚值有所不同。并非所有预热产品的厚度都减小了。纳米填料的厚度没有降低,而亚微米杂化材料之一的降幅最大。复合树脂的分类,填料含量或形状与膜厚之间没有相关性。在预热至54摄氏度和60摄氏度的复合树脂之间,厚度没有差异。室温和预热的常规复合树脂的膜厚大于可流动材料的膜厚。结论:预热常规复合树脂可以使某些产品的膜厚度降低,但流动性不能归因于复合树脂的分类,填料含量或形状。预热的复合树脂厚度大于所有可流动物的厚度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号