...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of oral implantology >Accuracy of cone beam computerized tomography and a three-dimensional stereolithographic model in identifying the anterior loop of the mental nerve: A study on cadavers
【24h】

Accuracy of cone beam computerized tomography and a three-dimensional stereolithographic model in identifying the anterior loop of the mental nerve: A study on cadavers

机译:锥束计算机断层扫描和三维立体光刻模型在识别神经前循环中的准确性:尸体的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The objective of this ex vivo cadaver study was to determine the accuracy of cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) and a 3-dimensional stereolithographic (STL) model in identifying and measuring the anterior loop length (ANLL) of the mental nerve. A total of 12 cadavers (24 mental nerve plexus) were used for this study. Standardized CBCT scans of each mandible were obtained both with and without radiographic contrast tracer injected into the mental nerve plexus, and STL models of the two acquired CBCT images were made. The ANLL were measured using CBCT, STL model, and anatomy. The measurements obtained from the CBCT images and STL models were then analyzed and compared with the direct anatomic measurements. A paired sample t test was used, and P values less than .05 were considered statistically significant. The mean difference between CBCT and anatomic measurement was 0.04 mm and was not statistically significant (P = .332), whereas the mean difference between STL models and anatomic measurement was 0.4 mm and was statistically significant (P = .042). There was also a statistical significant difference between CBCT and the STL model (P = .048) with the mean difference of 0.35 mm. Therefore, CBCT is an accurate and reliable method in determining and measuring the ANLL but the STL model over- or underestimated the ANLL by as much as 1.51 mm and 1.83 mm, respectively.
机译:这项离体尸体研究的目的是确定锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)和3维立体光刻(STL)模型在识别和测量精神神经前环长度(ANLL)方面的准确性。总共12个尸体(24个神经神经丛)用于这项研究。将每个下颌骨进行标准化CBCT扫描,无论是否在精神神经丛中注入放射造影对比示踪剂,并制作两个获取的CBCT图像的STL模型。使用CBCT,STL模型和解剖结构测量ANLL。然后分析从CBCT图像和STL模型获得的测量结果,并将其与直接解剖测量结果进行比较。使用配对样本t检验,并且将P值小于.05视为具有统计学意义。 CBCT与解剖测量之间的平均差异为0.04 mm,无统计学意义(P = .332),而STL模型与解剖测量之间的平均差异为0.4 mm,具有统计学意义(P = .042)。 CBCT和STL模型之间也存在统计学差异(P = .048),平均差异为0.35 mm。因此,CBCT是确定和测量ANLL的准确而可靠的方法,但是STL模型将ANLL分别高估或低估了1.51 mm和1.83 mm。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号