...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research >Prospective comparison of delivery outcomes of vaginal births after cesarean section versus laparoscopic myomectomy.
【24h】

Prospective comparison of delivery outcomes of vaginal births after cesarean section versus laparoscopic myomectomy.

机译:剖宫产与腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术后阴道分娩结果的前瞻性比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Dear Editor,Makino et ah conclude that 'The present investigation confirmed that vaginal birth after LM is as safe as VBAC...', yet this study was woefully underpowered to show any such thing. The rate of uterine rupture during attempted vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) during spontaneous labor is estimated to be 0.5%. Study groups of more than 1000 patients would be needed to demonstrate differences in risk (I'm sure your statistician can give a more accurate power calculation), yet this study reported just 38 attempted VBAC and 72 vaginal birth after laparo-scopic myomectomy (VBALM) with (not surprisingly) no adverse outcomes.
机译:亲爱的编辑,Makino等人得出结论:“目前的研究证实,LM后的阴道分娩与VBAC一样安全...”,但这项研究却无能为力,无法证明任何此类事情。在自然分娩过程中,剖宫产(VBAC)后企图进行阴道分娩时子宫破裂的发生率估计为0.5%。需要超过1000名患者的研究组来证明风险差异(我相信您的统计学家可以提供更准确的功效计算),但该研究报告,腹腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术(VBALM)后仅进行了38次尝试VBAC和72次阴道分娩)(无意外)没有不良后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号