首页> 外文期刊>The annals of pharmacotherapy >Review on the influence of protocol design on clinical outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis treated with Rituximab [Un análisis de la influencia del dise?o del protocolo sobre los resultados clínicos en artritis reumatoide tratada con Rituximab]
【24h】

Review on the influence of protocol design on clinical outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis treated with Rituximab [Un análisis de la influencia del dise?o del protocolo sobre los resultados clínicos en artritis reumatoide tratada con Rituximab]

机译:方案设计对利妥昔单抗治疗的类风湿关节炎临床疗效的影响综述[分析方案设计对利妥昔单抗治疗的类风湿关节炎临床疗效的影响分析]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To critically analyze the influence of protocol design on clinical outcome in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with rituximab. DATA SOURCES: A PubMed and EMBASE search (January 2000-January 2012) using the key words rheumatoid arthritis and rituximab was performed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: A search of English-language studies from the data sources was conducted for randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled studies with 100 patients or more assessing the efficacy and safety of rituximab in the treatment of RA. From these studies, 2 authors independently extracted, compiled, and aggregated the data. DATA SYNTHESIS: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. In these studies, some patients had not been treated with tumor necrosis factor-alfa (TNF-α) inhibitors, while most did not respond to it. The variables compared included dose (500 vs 1000 mg), duration of study (24 vs 48 weeks), and number of cycles (1 vs 2). They were statistically analyzed using the χ2 test. There was a statistically significant difference in the response to rituximab compared to the control (methotrexate) (p 0.001). In patients who were studied for only 24 weeks, given 500 or 1000 mg for 1 or 2 cycles, a 90% or greater response rate was reported in those who achieved an ACR 20, but no statistically significant differences were observed (p = 0.75). In patients studied for 48 weeks who received 2 cycles of either 500 mg or 1000 mg of rituximab and achieved an ACR 20, a statistically significant difference (p 0.001) was observed in those who received a dose of 1000 mg for 2 cycles (42.77% vs 67.49%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who are nonresponsive to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and TNF-α inhibitors, rituximab may be a promising and welltolerated biologic agent. The capacity of rituximab to produce long-term, sustained remissions could not be evaluated because the duration of the studies was limited to 24 weeks or 48 weeks. Studies with longer periods of observation are warranted.
机译:目的:严格分析方案设计对利妥昔单抗治疗的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者临床结局的影响。数据来源:使用关键词类风湿关节炎和利妥昔单抗进行了PubMed和EMBASE搜索(2000年1月至2012年1月)。研究的选择和数据提取:从数据源中检索英语研究,以随机,双盲,安慰剂对照研究的方式,对100名或以上患者进行评估,以评估利妥昔单抗在RA治疗中的疗效和安全性。从这些研究中,有2位作者独立提取,汇总和汇总了数据。数据综合:八项研究符合纳入标准。在这些研究中,一些患者未接受肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)抑制剂治疗,而大多数患者对此无反应。比较的变量包括剂量(500 vs 1000 mg),研究持续时间(24 vs 48周)和周期数(1 vs 2)。使用χ2检验对他们进行统计分析。与对照组(甲氨蝶呤)相比,对利妥昔单抗的反应有统计学上的显着差异(p <0.001)。在仅接受了24周研究的患者中,给予500或1000 mg的1或2个周期,达到ACR 20的患者有90%或更高的缓解率,但未观察到统计学差异(p = 0.75) 。在接受48个星期研究的患者中,接受2个疗程的500 mg或1000 mg利妥昔单抗并达到ACR 20,在接受2个疗程的1000 mg剂量的患者中观察到统计学上的显着差异(p <0.001)(42.77 %vs. 67.49%)。结论:在对改变疾病的抗风湿药和TNF-α抑制剂无反应的患者中,利妥昔单抗可能是一种有前途且耐受性良好的生物制剂。由于研究的持续时间仅限于24周或48周,因此无法评估利妥昔单抗产生长期,持续缓解的能力。观察期较长的研究是必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号