...
首页> 外文期刊>The annals of pharmacotherapy >Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients without gastrointestinal bleeding.
【24h】

Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients without gastrointestinal bleeding.

机译:抗生素预防可预防无胃肠道出血的患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To review relevant studies for both primary and secondary antibiotic prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in patients with cirrhosis without gastrointestinal bleeding. DATA SOURCES: A search of PubMed (1980-July 2010) was conducted using the terms prophylaxis, SBP, and antibiotics. A manual review of bibliographies was conducted for inclusion of relevant articles. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Prospective studies and meta-analyses published in English were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: Ten trials and 3 meta-analyses were included. Of the 10 trials, 2 examined the use of secondary prophylaxis for prevention of subsequent episodes of SBP, 4 examined the use of primary prophylaxis to prevent an initial SBP episode, and 4 examined the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in a mixed population. Seven trials evaluated the use of an antibiotic compared to placebo or no treatment. Only 1 trial evaluated norfloxacin versus trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Trial duration varied from 24 days to 12 months. In general, trials examining norfloxacin as secondary prophylaxis found significantly decreased occurrence of SBP but no significant difference in mortality rates. Primary prophylaxis studies found no significant difference in the incidence of infections, including SBP, with norfloxacin or ciprofloxacin treatment but significantly lower incidence of gram-negative infections. Mixed population studies found a significantly decreased incidence of SBP but no significant difference in mortality. In the 3 meta-analyses, a significant decrease in mortality and an overall decrease in SBP incidence in the treatment groups were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Based on currently available data, the use of prophylactic antibiotic therapy is warranted for the prevention of recurrent SBP in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. In patients with low ascetic fluid protein and at least 1 more risk factor, primary prophylaxis may be considered. Further studies with improved methodology are needed to determine whether prophylactic antibiotic therapy has an impact on mortality.
机译:目的:回顾性研究肝硬化无消化道出血患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)一级和二级抗生素预防的相关研究。数据来源:使用预防,SBP和抗生素等术语对PubMed(1980年-2010年7月)进行了搜索。对书目进行了人工审查,以纳入相关文章。研究选择和数据提取:包括以英语发表的前瞻性研究和荟萃分析。数据综合:包括十项试验和三项荟萃分析。在10项试验中,有2项检查了二级预防措施在预防SBP后续发作中的作用,有4项检查了一级预防措施在预防最初SBP发作中的作用,还有4例在混合人群中研究了预防性使用抗生素的情况。七项试验评估了与安慰剂或未治疗相比使用抗生素的情况。只有1个试验评估了诺氟沙星与甲氧苄氨嘧啶/磺胺甲基异恶唑的比较。试用期从24天到12个月不等。通常,将诺氟沙星作为次要预防措施的试验发现,SBP的发生率显着降低,但死亡率没有显着差异。初步的预防性研究发现,用诺氟沙星或环丙沙星治疗的包括SBP在内的感染发生率无显着差异,但革兰氏阴性感染的发生率却显着降低。混合人群研究发现SBP的发生率显着降低,但死亡率没有显着差异。在这3项荟萃分析中,注意到治疗组的死亡率显着降低,SBP发生率总体降低。结论:根据目前可获得的数据,预防性抗生素治疗可用于预防肝硬化和腹水患者的复发性SBP。对于低糖液蛋白且至少有1个以上危险因素的患者,可以考虑进行一级预防。需要通过改进方法的进一步研究来确定预防性抗生素治疗是否对死亡率产生影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号