首页> 外文期刊>The annals of pharmacotherapy >Systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, safety, and tolerability data from randomized controlled trials of drugs used to treat postherpetic neuralgia.
【24h】

Systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, safety, and tolerability data from randomized controlled trials of drugs used to treat postherpetic neuralgia.

机译:对用于治疗带状疱疹后遗神经痛的药物进行的随机对照试验的功效,安全性和耐受性数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of available data from reports of randomized controlled trials on the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of drugs used to treat postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), a common type of neuropathic pain. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE (1950-June 30, 2009) and EMBASE (1974-June 30, 2009) databases were used to identify source studies, in conjunction with a review of reference citations from identified published reports. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: We selected all English-language reports of randomized placebo-controlled trials of the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of drugs (oral or transdermal) used for treatment in patients with PHN. Studies with treatment duration less than 4 weeks were excluded. From each identified trial, we extracted information on (1) placebo-corrected percentage reductions in pain intensity from randomization to end of active treatment; (2) relative risks of withdrawal due to lack of efficacy; (3) relative risks of various adverse events; and (4) relative risks of withdrawal due to adverse events. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twelve reports of randomized controlled trials in patients with PHN were identified, involving 8 different agents (amitriptyline, capsaicin, divalproex sodium, gabapentin, morphine, nortriptyline, pregabalin, tramadol). Most studies were small, involving fewer than 200 patients. Pain intensity was reported to have been reduced significantly with all drugs (range: 13.8% [tramadol] to 42.4% [amitriptyline]); data were pooled using techniques of meta-analysis when information was available from more than 1 trial. No clinical trial reported a significant reduction in risk of withdrawal as a result of lack of efficacy. Analysis of adverse events was greatly limited by erratic and inconsistent reporting and wide variation in sample sizes. CONCLUSIONS: While available literature establishes the efficacy of 8 drugs in treatment of PHN, it does not provide adequate guidance as to which agents are best to treat this condition, in part because of inadequate reporting of data on tolerability and safety.
机译:目的:对随机对照试验的报道进行系统性回顾,该报道涉及用于治疗疱疹后神经痛(PHN)(一种常见的神经性疼痛)的药物的疗效,安全性和耐受性。数据来源:MEDLINE(1950年6月30日,2009年6月30日)和EMBASE(1974年6月30日,2009年)数据库用于鉴定来源研究,并结合已鉴定的已发表报告中的参考文献进行回顾。研究的选择和数据提取:我们选择了所有英语语言报告,以随机安慰剂对照试验的形式对治疗PHN的药物(口服或经皮)的功效,耐受性和安全性进行研究。治疗时间少于4周的研究被排除在外。从每个确定的试验中,我们提取了以下信息:(1)从随机分组到积极治疗结束,安慰剂校正的疼痛强度降低百分比; (2)因缺乏疗效而退出的相对风险; (三)各种不良事件的相对风险; (4)因不良事件而退出的相对风险。数据综合:鉴定了12例PHN患者的随机对照试验报告,涉及8种不同药物(阿米替林,辣椒素,双丙戊酸钠,加巴喷丁,吗啡,去甲替林,普瑞巴林,曲马多)。大多数研究规模较小,涉及不到200名患者。据报道,所有药物的疼痛强度均已明显降低(范围:13.8%[曲马多]至42.4%[阿米替林]);当可以从多个试验中获得信息时,使用荟萃分析技术汇总数据。没有临床试验报告由于缺乏疗效而使戒断风险显着降低。不良事件的分析在很大程度上受到报告不稳定和不一致以及样本量差异很大的限制。结论:尽管现有文献确定了8种药物治疗PHN的疗效,但对于哪种药物最适合治疗该病并没有提供足够的指导,部分原因是关于耐受性和安全性数据的报道不足。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号