首页> 外文期刊>The annals of pharmacotherapy >Clinically significant drug-drug interactions between oral anticancer agents and nonanticancer agents: profiling and comparison of two drug compendia.
【24h】

Clinically significant drug-drug interactions between oral anticancer agents and nonanticancer agents: profiling and comparison of two drug compendia.

机译:口服抗癌药和非抗癌药之间临床上重要的药物相互作用:两种药物概要的分析和比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Use of oral anticancer agents is gaining wide acceptance in the treatment of cancer. However, patients receiving oral therapy are at high risk for drug-drug interactions (DDIs). OBJECTIVE: To create a drug profile for each clinically significant DDI involving selected oral anticancer agents and evaluate the agreement between 2 commonly used DDI compendia: Drug Interaction Facts (DIF) 2008 and Micromedex DRUGDEX. METHODS: DDI profiles were developed based on primary and tertiary literature reviews. DIF 2008 and Micromedex DRUGDEX were compared to assess the consistency of listings, severity, and scientific evidence ratings of DDIs involving the oral anticancer agents that were selected. The Spearman correlation test was used to assess the correlation of the severity ratings between the 2 compendia. RESULTS: A total of 184 DDIs were identified. A DDI profile was created for 40 of these that met the predetermined criteria for clinically significant interactions. The comparative assessment showed inconsistency in DDI listings (15.2% of those identified were listed in DIF only and 46.7% were listed in Micromedex only), severity ratings (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.49), and scientific evidence ratings (disagreement 25.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The discrepancies in DDI listing and rating systems between the compendia evaluated here reflect the need for more studies to standardize the definitions and classifications of DDIs.
机译:背景:口服抗癌药的使用在癌症治疗中获得了广泛的接受。但是,接受口服治疗的患者发生药物-药物相互作用(DDI)的风险很高。目的:为涉及选定的口服抗癌药的每个临床上重要的DDI创建药物概况,并评估2种常用DDI纲要之间的一致性:Drug Interaction Facts(DIF)2008和Micromedex DRUGDEX。方法:DDI概况是根据主要和第三级文献综述而开发的。将DIF 2008和Micromedex DRUGDEX进行了比较,以评估涉及所选口服抗癌药的DDI的列表一致性,严重性和科学证据等级。 Spearman相关检验用于评估2个纲要之间严重程度等级的相关性。结果:总共确定了184个DDI。为其中40个满足临床上显着相互作用的预定标准的DDI配置文件创建了一个DDI配置文件。对比评估显示DDI列表不一致(仅在DIF中列出了15.2%,仅在Micromedex中列出了46.7%),严重性等级(Spearman相关系数0.49)和科学证据等级(差异25.8%)。结论:此处评估的纲要之间DDI列表和评级系统之间的差异反映出需要进行更多研究以标准化DDI的定义和分类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号